Hi,
I activated polling in 8 interfaces em0... em7 (ifconfig em* polling) to
carry through performance tests, when activating, it had a significant
reduction of CPU usage, load average measured of "0,50, 0,69, 0,52" for
"0,43, 0,39, 0,21" and the CPU usage (SNMP Graphic) measured of 35% for
5
David Christensen wrote:
I want to do some wider testing on non-Intel based systems with
current and new Broadcom drivers. Feel free to email me directly
if you have a suggestion.
look at getting a PG powerPC off ebay..
(I can help you set it up if you wish..
I just did a dozen of them for wor
> > I want to do some wider testing on non-Intel based systems with
> > current and new Broadcom drivers. Feel free to email me directly
> > if you have a suggestion.
>
> look at getting a PG powerPC off ebay..
>
> (I can help you set it up if you wish..
> I just did a dozen of them for work).
>
Claudio Jeker wrote:
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:05:51PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
I'm looking for a recommendation for a big endian CPU system that
works well with FreeBSD. It would be best if it didn't use a 4KB
page size but that's a secondary issue. The system should support
PCI Expre
David Christensen wrote:
I'm looking for a recommendation for a big endian CPU system that
works well with FreeBSD. It would be best if it didn't use a 4KB
page size but that's a secondary issue. The system should support
PCI Express with at least two x8 slots and PCI-X would be a plus.
A half-
For sun4u FreeBSD only supports up through USII which I doubt comes in
any PCI-e systems. sun4v of course only comes with PCI-e but isn't
really in a production-worthy state right now.
-Kip
On Feb 7, 2008 1:17 PM, Claudio Jeker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:05:51PM -0
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 01:05:51PM -0800, David Christensen wrote:
> I'm looking for a recommendation for a big endian CPU system that
> works well with FreeBSD. It would be best if it didn't use a 4KB
> page size but that's a secondary issue. The system should support
> PCI Express with at least
I'm looking for a recommendation for a big endian CPU system that
works well with FreeBSD. It would be best if it didn't use a 4KB
page size but that's a secondary issue. The system should support
PCI Express with at least two x8 slots and PCI-X would be a plus.
A half-height or full-height rack
Apologies for the top post? Looks like I need a lesson in etiquette as well
as devfs.
The problem is this. I have two boxes running 6.3-stable. One is i386 and
the other is amd64. Identical setups as near as I can make it. the 386 box
allows mounting floppy from kde, but does not find cd0 in
Kevin, just a side note.
Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 10:46:04AM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > Set vfs.usermount=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf and restart sysctl via
> > '/etc/rc.d/sysctl restart'. But be aware of security implications:
> > anyone will be able to mount devices that are opened to him/her via
>
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 21:40:00 +0300
> From: Eygene Ryabinkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Good day.
>
> Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:33:30PM +, lysergius2001 wrote:
> > Ah! That helps. Still cannot mount floppy except as root?
>
> Set vfs.usermount=1 in /etc/sysctl.con
Good day.
Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 06:33:30PM +, lysergius2001 wrote:
> Ah! That helps. Still cannot mount floppy except as root?
Set vfs.usermount=1 in /etc/sysctl.conf and restart sysctl via
'/etc/rc.d/sysctl restart'. But be aware of security implications:
anyone will be able to mount devic
> Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2008 18:33:30 +
> From: lysergius2001 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Ah! That helps. Still cannot mount floppy except as root?
>
Please, don't top-post!
Is vfs.usermount=1?
--
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernes
Ah! That helps. Still cannot mount floppy except as root?
On Feb 7, 2008 12:10 AM, John-Mark Gurney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> lysergius2001 wrote this message on Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 20:48 +:
> > Thanks for this.
> >
> > /etc/rc.d/devfs start results in
> > eval: 1: syntax error: untermi
> The motherboard of my HP proliant DL360 G4p was changed and now I
> cannot see my network cards (BCM5704 netXtreme dual gigabit). I'm
> running FreeBSD 6.2 p5...
>
> Here is what I have in dmsg
>
> bge0: mem
> 0xfdef-0xfdef
> irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2
> bge0: Reserved 0x1 bytes
I'm not seeing the Neighbor Solicitation messages I think I should see on a
restart or even a reboot. Is this broken in 5.4? I see that it works in 6.1...
Thanks,
"No man, for any considerable period, can wear one face to himself and another
to the multitude without finally getting bewildered
Me again.
Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 05:58:32PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> > > Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> > > that all columns are correc
Hello,
The motherboard of my HP proliant DL360 G4p was changed and now I
cannot see my network cards (BCM5704 netXtreme dual gigabit). I'm
running FreeBSD 6.2 p5...
Here is what I have in dmsg
bge0: mem 0xfdef-0xfdef
irq 25 at device 2.0 on pci2
bge0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x10
Hello list,
I will be grateful if someone could point me to the right direction
regarding the question below.
My device driver is getting incoming packets fine, but for some reason I
am not able to send a single packet. Here is the source code:
http://www.freebsd.az/if_ib.c
I've added sev
Josef, Claudio, good day.
Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 03:14:22PM +0100, Claudio Jeker wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> > that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
> >
>
> The nexthop selection f
Dear all,
I was able to build an IPv4 only kernel by having
options INET
#options INET6
in the kernel config file.
Is it supposed to work that one can build a IPv6-only
kernel by using
#options INET
options INET6
And should I be able to compile a kernel without IPv4 and IPv6
support by using
#o
On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 08:49:44AM +0100, Josef Pojsl wrote:
> Hi Eygene,
>
> Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
> that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
>
The nexthop selection for point to point links had a bug in versions
previous to 4.2. This should be fixed
On Thu, 2008-02-07 at 20:48 +0900, Wilkinson, Alex wrote:
> 0n Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:45:13PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>
> >Any chance the recent root zone changes would make it to 7.0?
>
> Erm, curious, what where these changes in the first place ?
>
> -aW
>
>
From cvs-all:
dougb
0n Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:45:13PM +0200, Petri Helenius wrote:
>Any chance the recent root zone changes would make it to 7.0?
Erm, curious, what where these changes in the first place ?
-aW
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Australian Defence
Organisation and is subj
Hi Eygene,
Thanks a lot for your remarks. I absolutely agree with you
that all columns are correct except the Nexthop.
On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 06:21:42PM +0300, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Josef, good day.
>
> Currently I can not answer your question, sorry. I just have the
> remark.
>
> Wed, Fe
(sorry for cross-posting)
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 04:30:21PM +0300, Yuri Pankov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> `netstat -rn` on 7.0-RC1/sparc64 shows 0.0.0.0 instead of actual network
> numbers, while those networks are accessible.
>
> > ifconfig
> dc0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500
> options=8
>
26 matches
Mail list logo
