Hi Doug,
> On 7. Aug 2022, at 2:15 PM, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> Of course but this argument is confusing - we are talking about DHCP client,
> not server.
You brought up Dynamic DNS and I see now that
a discussion with you is not fruitful for a
multitude of reasons so I am kindly not going
to r
For some reasons. I can’t use SR-IOV on my freebsd machines (HPE DL160 gen10)
with latest 25G HPE branded cards. I opened tickets for that but since then no
move happened.
So I wonder id there is a good setup to use these cards with the
virtualization. Which kind of performance should I expect
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=263986
Hiroki Sato changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||h...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265431
--- Comment #5 from Anthael ---
VMWare
ESXi : 7.0.3
Build: 20036589
Virtual Machine
Opnsense running FreeBsd 13
FreeBSD 13.1-RELEASE stable/22.7-n250212-a26d6065f1f SMP amd64
4 NIC 1G binded on driver VMXNEXT3
2 NIC 10G binded on driver V
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265431
--- Comment #4 from Anthael ---
(In reply to Anthael from comment #3)
the pci passthrought seems refusing to be activated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=265431
--- Comment #3 from Anthael ---
Created attachment 235760
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=235760&action=edit
vmware hardware pci passthrought
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
To view an individual PR, use:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=(Bug Id).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users,
which need special attention. These represent problem reports covering
all versions including experimental development code and ob
On Sun, 07 Aug 2022 23:23:37 +0900 (JST)
Hiroki Sato wrote:
> "Ben Woods" wrote
> in :
>
> wo> If accepted, I would recommend a phased implementation such as that
> wo> suggested below - open to ideas.
> wo>
> wo> - 14.0 (and perhaps 13.2) - dhcpcd included but off by default
> wo> - (WITH_D
In message
, Doug Rabson writes:
> --19ac6805e5a1cb9a
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 08:08, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > Hi Ben,
> >
> > > On 7. Aug 2022, at 7:31 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
> > >
> > > Rea
"Ben Woods" wrote
in :
wo> If accepted, I would recommend a phased implementation such as that
wo> suggested below - open to ideas.
wo>
wo> - 14.0 (and perhaps 13.2) - dhcpcd included but off by default
wo> - (WITH_DHCPCD=on, but rc.conf/network.subr continue to use
wo> - dhclient/rtsold). Rel
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 09:04, Franco Fichtner wrote:
>
> > On 7. Aug 2022, at 9:38 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
> >
> > I'm not sure what the problem is here? I'm using dhcpcd client in my
> home lab with pfsense acting as dhcp and dhcp6 server and it works great,
> including prefix delegation. Choosin
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022, at 3:08 PM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Having worked on dhclient and rtsold in FreeBSD and worked with it for years
> in pfSense/OPNsense the proposal here seems to be to throw all progress away
> that would definitely have to be rebuilt in the years to follow for the
> On 7. Aug 2022, at 9:38 AM, Doug Rabson wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the problem is here? I'm using dhcpcd client in my home lab
> with pfsense acting as dhcp and dhcp6 server and it works great, including
> prefix delegation. Choosing a new dhcp client in FreeBSD certainly doesn't
> requi
On Sun, 7 Aug 2022 at 08:08, Franco Fichtner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> > On 7. Aug 2022, at 7:31 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
> >
> > Reason: ensure fresh installs of FreeBSD support using DHCPv6 and prefix
> delegation to obtain an IP address (not supported by dhclient or rtsold).
> Having it in ports/packa
Hi Ben,
> On 7. Aug 2022, at 7:31 AM, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> Reason: ensure fresh installs of FreeBSD support using DHCPv6 and prefix
> delegation to obtain an IP address (not supported by dhclient or rtsold).
> Having it in ports/packages could be problematic if people cannot obtain an
> IPv6
15 matches
Mail list logo
