On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some thoughts about this topic.
>
> Delaying ACKs means loss of performance when using Gigabit TCP
> connections in data centers. There it is important to ACK the data as
> quick as possible, to avoid running out of
On 10/26/22 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
It focuses on QUIC, but congestion control dynamics don't change with
the protocol. You should be able to read there, but if not I'm happy to
send anyone a pdf.
If QUIC doesn't support TSO (Large Send Offload), it cannot be compared
I think.
--HPS
Hi
Despite the error increments in the interface, I used the equipment for a
month until I migrated my things from the router I had and even with a
large error increment I didn't have any problems with packet loss or
routing.
Em ter., 25 de out. de 2022 às 17:58, Victor Gamov escreveu:
> So, it
> On 26. Oct 2022, at 13:11, Cristian Cardoso
> wrote:
>
> Despite the error increments in the interface, I used the equipment for a
> month until I migrated my things from the router I had and even with a large
> error increment I didn't have any problems with packet loss or routing.
The c
> On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some thoughts about this topic.
>>
>> Delaying ACKs means loss of performance when using Gigabit TCP
>> connections in data centers. There it is important to ACK
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:55:21PM +0200, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
> > On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Some thoughts about this topic.
> >>
> >> Delaying ACKs means loss of performance w
> On 26. Oct 2022, at 14:59, Tom Jones wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 02:55:21PM +0200, tue...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> On 26. Oct 2022, at 10:57, Tom Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 22, 2022 at 12:14:25PM +0200, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Some thoughts about this topic.
I check the patch and looks like huge errors counter due huge UDP
traffic in my case. I'll try to upgared and check it.
Thanks for everyone!
On 26.10.2022 14:34, Franco Fichtner wrote:
On 26. Oct 2022, at 13:11, Cristian Cardoso
wrote:
Despite the error increments in the interface, I us
Hi All
Up this thread after few years :-)
Now I have following HW/SW setup:
- FreeBSD 12.3-STABLE r372089 GENERIC amd64
- Xeon(R) CPU E5-2470 v2 @ 2.40GHz
- ix0 hardware
- about 10-15 vlans like "vlan: 100 vlanpcp: 0 parent interface: ix0"
- and all vlans are bridged via bridgeX
- about 200 mul
On Oct 17, I wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 27, 2022 at 03:53:12PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote:
> > > I recently noticed the following behavior:
> > >
> > > % ping6 redrock
> > > ping6: Name does not resolve
> > > % host redrock
> > > redrock.karels.net has
10 matches
Mail list logo