Re: SO_ACCEPTCONN equivalent

2007-03-08 Thread Alexandru Arion
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 11:36 +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Alexandru Arion wrote: > > > > Thanks for both suggestions. Since I'll support version 5.4 and up, this > > leaves me to using the workaround implied by calling accept and checking > > the returned value,

Re: SO_ACCEPTCONN equivalent

2007-03-08 Thread Alexandru Arion
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 19:34 +, Bruce M. Simpson wrote: > Alexandru Arion wrote: > > Is there an equivalent in FreeBSD to the SO_ACCEPTCONN option for > > getsockopt(), available in Linux? It doesn't actually has to be an > > option for getsockopt(), just a way to dete

SO_ACCEPTCONN equivalent

2007-03-07 Thread Alexandru Arion
Hi, I'm rather new here, so excuses in advance if the question is out of topic. Is there an equivalent in FreeBSD to the SO_ACCEPTCONN option for getsockopt(), available in Linux? It doesn't actually has to be an option for getsockopt(), just a way to determine if a socket has been marked to acce