On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, at 04:41, Max Laier wrote:
> All,
>
> the new version at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~mlaier/new_iwi/20060315.both.tgz
>
> should build for RELENG_6 and HEAD. Make sure to have the latest RELENG_6
> checkout with the taskqueue changes.
>
> This version supports version
Hello,
I wanted to use ng_netflow on a disc interface, but it seems that no
node is created for loopback and the like . Indeed, I found an old
post from gnn@ dating back from march 2000 on this subject, along
with the PR kern/17631. Is somebody reconsidering this idea by any
cha
On Thu, 25 May 2006, at 11:46, Julian Elischer wrote:
> Yann Berthier wrote:
>
> I think that Gleb had some changes that allowed netgraph to attach to
> ANY interface.
this may well be a pilot error on my side, i can very well miss
something trivial
i tried so
On Mon, 29 May 2006, at 15:51, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2006 at 09:43:19PM +0200, Yann Berthier wrote:
> Y>
> Y>Hello Gleb,
> Y>
> Y>err, sorry for the forward if you saw the thread already but, have
> Y>you any input on this ? tha
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006, at 09:20, Roger T. Harvey wrote:
> Ok, I've done research, and found this example to track bytes per ip on LAN:
As suggested, ng_netflow() coupled with net-mgmt/nfdump may well do
what you need. net-mgmt/nfsen on top of that if you change your mind
regarding graphs.
Hello,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, at 12:36, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Hi all:
>
> The following link:
>
> http://www.sctp.org/cvs_diff_6_30.bz2
>
> Will get you a large patch that you can apply to Current that
> will add SCTP.
Pilot error ? freshly cvsuped src, patch applied cleanly,
made
On Sun, 02 Jul 2006, at 07:37, Randall Stewart wrote:
> Yann:
>
> Sorry for the delay.. I would have responded quicker
> but we have company for this long weekend in the US :-D
no problem really
> This is definetly a pilot error on my part..
ok never mind: it was a pilot error on my sid
Hello,
On Fri, 07 Jul 2006, at 07:40, Randall Stewart wrote:
> George V. Neville-Neil wrote:
>
> >
> >I already sent the pointer to my version of NetPIPE (the pounder you
> >mention) and their new release should have SCTP in it by default.
> >
> >Later,
> >George
> >
>
>
> Ok, no doc's jus
Hello,
On Mon, 17 Jul 2006, at 07:54, Randall Stewart wrote:
> All:
>
> Just a friendly reminder/prod... if you have started
> testing SCTP.. thats great (any feedback?)..
As said last time, i've been using sctp with netflow records between
a router and a freebsd box - perhaps not the
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, at 23:34, V.Chukharev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It seems that iwi driver cannot survive more than just a few cycles of
> switching down/up.
> In a place with a bad wireless connection I needed to do that quite a number
> of times
> (that was the simplest way to restore connectivity
On Sun, 18 Feb 2007, at 16:20, Max Laier wrote:
> The linux driver uses one continuous buffer as well. I tried to hand in
> separate buffers, but it failed to initialize the firmware. Attached is
> a diff (for HEAD and RELENG_6) to allocate the DMA buffer once and keep
> it around. As I said
On Sun, 24 Jun 2007, at 21:31, Vlad GALU wrote:
>Hi list, I have SCTP, SCTP_DEBUG and SCTP_HIGH_SPEED defined in my
> kernel configuration file. However, it looks that the SCTP source
> files aren't even built, so the linking fails with
try including INET6 and see if it helps - when i tr
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> Helge Oldach escribió:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
> > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
> > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a
Hello,
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006, at 01:39, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following some short discussion on freebsd-pf I've written (mostly
> copied, but let's skip that for a moment) short patch for ip_input.c,
> that does uRPF check for incoming packets.
>
> In some simple words, it's exac
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006, at 14:58, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> Yann Berthier wrote:
>
> >If this yet to be found wiser guy would not forget the loose check
> >too (verrevpath in ipfw speaking), where packets matching the default
> >route are ok ... :)
>
>
15 matches
Mail list logo
