Hej, wanna check if anyone encountered this problem:
I setup 4 mesh nodes in a link topology ( 0 <-> 1 <-> 2 <-> 3)
But I cant ping from 3 to 0, or 0 to 3, without first ping between the
nodes to fill the hwmp route tables.
This is hwmp+mesh debug output from one of the edge nodes when running
"p
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:06:41 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
> Hej, wanna check if anyone encountered this problem:
> I setup 4 mesh nodes in a link topology ( 0 <-> 1 <-> 2 <-> 3)
>
> But I cant ping from 3 to 0, or 0 to 3, without first ping between
> the nodes to fill the hwmp route table
Okej, I run all four scenarios:
0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost
1->3 OK,
2->0 OK,
3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2
looks like path is built correct in one way only? :S
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:19 AM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:06:41 Monthada
On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:42:05 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
> Okej, I run all four scenarios:
>
> 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost
> 1->3 OK,
> 2->0 OK,
> 3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2
>
> looks like path is built correct in one way only? :S
I have no clue about the m
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:42:05 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
>> Okej, I run all four scenarios:
>>
>> 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost
>> 1->3 OK,
>> 2->0 OK,
>> 3->1 FAIL, works after "ping -c 1" 1->2
>>
>> looks like pa
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Monthadar Al Jaberi
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Bernhard Schmidt
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, February 10, 2011 11:42:05 Monthadar Al Jaberi wrote:
>>> Okej, I run all four scenarios:
>>>
>>> 0->2 OK, but the first "ping -c 1" got lost
>>> 1->3 OK,
>>
