Hello,
Trying out FreeBSD for the first time to build a firewall box that’s multi-core
and runs PF. I’m very interested in the FIB code, as it lines up well with the
way my core networking equipment works and should allow me to route traffic on
an interface that’s logically separate from the m
> On 28 Dec 2014, at 03:19 , Jason Healy wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Trying out FreeBSD for the first time to build a firewall box that’s
> multi-core and runs PF. I’m very interested in the FIB code, as it lines up
> well with the way my core networking equipment works and should allow me to
> r
On 12/28/14 11:19 AM, Jason Healy wrote:
Hello,
Trying out FreeBSD for the first time to build a firewall box that’s multi-core
and runs PF. I’m very interested in the FIB code, as it lines up well with the
way my core networking equipment works and should allow me to route traffic on
an int
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> On 28 Dec 2014, at 03:19 , Jason Healy wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Trying out FreeBSD for the first time to build a firewall box that’s
>> multi-core and runs PF. I’m very interested in the FIB code, as it lines up
>> well with the way
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 16:03 , Alan Somers wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>
>> People simply broke it (again). Please file a bug report. You may mention
>> that there are regression test scripts in src/tools/ somewhere to test all
>> the cases for IPv6.
>
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>
>> On 29 Dec 2014, at 16:03 , Alan Somers wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 3:16 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>>
>>> People simply broke it (again). Please file a bug report. You may
>>> mention that there are regression test scripts
On Dec 29, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> to some extent this is what it was written for.. teh fib code was written for
> Ironport/Cisco for separating the management port from the data ports onn
> their appliances, however the VNET code that came later is an even cleaner
> way of
On 12/30/14 1:59 AM, Jason Healy wrote:
On Dec 29, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
to some extent this is what it was written for.. teh fib code was written for
Ironport/Cisco for separating the management port from the data ports onn their
appliances, however the VNET code that cam
> On 29 Dec 2014, at 19:17 , Julian Elischer wrote:
>
> On 12/30/14 1:59 AM, Jason Healy wrote:
>> On Dec 29, 2014, at 1:28 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
>>
>>> to some extent this is what it was written for.. teh fib code was written
>>> for Ironport/Cisco for separating the management port fro
On Dec 29, 2014, at 2:34 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb
wrote:
> pf and VNETs are a cause for panic at the moment; don’t go that route (yet).
Good to know.
With that in mind, I think my best workaround for now is to disable IPv6 on the
management interface, leaving the transit interface as the only one
10 matches
Mail list logo