All,
I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
"strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would
send and receive IP packets through the "correct" interface (that is,
the physical interfa
Helge Oldach wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
> "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
> FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would
> send and receive IP packets through the "correct" inter
Helge Oldach escribió:
>
> All,
>
> I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
> "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
> FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would
> send and receive IP packets through the "correct" in
On Mon, 02 Dec 2002, Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
> Helge Oldach escribió:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
> > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
> > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a
Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella:
> Helge Oldach escribió:
> > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the
> > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on
> > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would
> > send and receive IP
Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella wrote:
I don't like the strong ES model. IMHO, with weak ES model we can
obtain the best of multihoming benefits. the strong ES model
makes use of source routing, which might forbid the communication
where it could be possible.
I don't see why a host should disc
