Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Julian Elischer
Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:07:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it. however I have only been able to get 60kB.sec across this, despite having a

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:00:52AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:07:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it.

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Lars Eggert
I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it. however I have only been able to get 60kB.sec across this, despite having a tcp window size of 131072 bytes.. After investigation it appears that the link is massively

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Julian Elischer
Brooks Davis wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 11:00:52AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:07:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Andre Oppermann
Julian Elischer wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:07:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it. however I have only been able to get 60kB.sec

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Julian Elischer
Andre Oppermann wrote: Julian Elischer wrote: Brooks Davis wrote: On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 05:07:36PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it. however I have only

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Wilkinson, Alex
0n Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:34:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: DeltaT SEQ-SRTR:SEQ_ENDpacket# -- 346853 2856:2920(64)1 370821 2920:4368(1448) 2 004410 8712:10160(1448) 6 007848

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread Julian Elischer
Wilkinson, Alex wrote: 0n Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 03:34:03PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: DeltaT SEQ-SRTR:SEQ_ENDpacket# -- 346853 2856:2920(64)1 370821 2920:4368(1448) 2 004410 8712:10160(1448) 6

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-13 Thread gnn
At Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:07:36 -0800, julian wrote: and secondly, does anyone have any experience with this sort of problem? Here is a paper on the subject: http://www.postel.org/pipermail/end2end-interest/2002-January/001705.html Later, George ___

TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-12 Thread Julian Elischer
I have a link which is provided by someone else that is 7 x E1s aggregated. At leat it looks that way to me when I get to see it. however I have only been able to get 60kB.sec across this, despite having a tcp window size of 131072 bytes.. After investigation it appears that the link is massively

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-12 Thread Eli Dart
In reply to Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I have no control over or access to the link.. all I have is a promise that they will deliver 14Mb/Sec. with approc 300mSec. RTT to me but there is no promise about packet order. My guess is that they are doing round-robin load balancing,

Re: TCP out-of-order packets.

2005-01-12 Thread Julian Elischer
Eli Dart wrote: In reply to Julian Elischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] : I have no control over or access to the link.. all I have is a promise that they will deliver 14Mb/Sec. with approc 300mSec. RTT to me but there is no promise about packet order. My guess is that they are doing round-robin