On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 9:42 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>>
Should work.
Please try the lates
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>>
>>> Should work.
>>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Luigi
>>>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:57 PM, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Should work.
>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>
>> Cheers
>> Luigi
>>
>
> OK just cloned.
>
> What should tbe topology be like?
>
> igb(4) ->
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> Should work.
> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>
> Cheers
> Luigi
>
OK just cloned.
What should tbe topology be like?
igb(4) -> netmap bridge -> vale -> ipfw?
will lagg0 -> netmap bridge -> ipfw work too?
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Marcelo Gondim
wrote:
> On 30/09/2014 13:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
>> Should work.
>> Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
>>
>> Cheers
>> Luigi
>>
>
> Hi Luigi,
>
> The netmap-ipfw be included in the FreeBSD 10.1 final?
>
no it is ou
On 30/09/2014 13:49, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Should work.
Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
Cheers
Luigi
Hi Luigi,
The netmap-ipfw be included in the FreeBSD 10.1 final?
Cheers,
Gondim
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
I have a problem, whe
Should work.
Please try the latest version from code.google.com/p/netmap-ipfw/
Cheers
Luigi
On Tuesday, September 30, 2014, Eduardo Meyer wrote:
> I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
> enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userlan
I have a problem, where I need to fwd a high rate of pps, and I dont have
enough CPU. It's around 900Kpps, so I would like to know if ipfw userland
version with netmap support will do fwd?
Here are my current rules:
00100 fwd 10.1.2.1 tag tcp from table(100) to any dst-port 80,1024-65535 in
{ via