Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Petri Helenius
Eric Anderson wrote: I'm using fiber channel SATA, and I get 2x write as I do read, which doesn't make sense to me. What kind of write speeds do you get? My tiny brain tells me that reads should be faster than writes with a RAID5. I'm seeing similar sequential performance on RELENG_5_3 and REL

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Eric Anderson
Peter Losher wrote: Steven Hartland wrote: 5.4-STABLE Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 ( 5 disk ) dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 65536 bytes transferred in 13.348032 secs (49097875 bytes/sec) Have you tried the driver supplied by Highpoint as a pre

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Peter Losher
Steven Hartland wrote: > 5.4-STABLE Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 ( 5 disk ) > dd if=/dev/da0 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=1 > 1+0 records in > 1+0 records out > 65536 bytes transferred in 13.348032 secs (49097875 bytes/sec) Have you tried the driver supplied by Highpoint as a pre-compiled

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
Scott I've sent this to you as from reading around you did the original driver conversion and as such may have an idea on the areas I could look at hope you dont mind. Ok some real strange going on write performance is ~ 140MB/s: gstat: dT: 0.505 flag_I 50us sizeof 240 i -1 L(q) ops/sr/

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Arne Wörner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Did you try RedHat Linux or FreeBSD R4? Haven't tried R4 or Linux yet. Just finished restoring 700GB onto the machine and would rather not have to do that again :) Steve Thi

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Eric Anderson
Arne Wörner wrote: --- Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Only on write this is a read test. Oh. Ok! :-) But there is a striping-like effect (especially when u use n=8 discs in one RAID-5 and when u do sequential read), so that the performance could be easily (n-1)*40MB/sec (which would be

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Wörner
--- Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only on write this is a read test. > Oh. Ok! :-) But there is a striping-like effect (especially when u use n=8 discs in one RAID-5 and when u do sequential read), so that the performance could be easily (n-1)*40MB/sec (which would be in your case 3

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Wörner
--- Steven Hartland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: "Eric Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Where do I start looking? > > First, understand that RAID 5 is dependant on fast hardware to > > performa > > the XOR operations. A single disk without any RAID can easily > > outperform a RAID array i

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Eric Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Correct - I misread the dd line. When you are doing the dd, what is your system busy doing? (top/ps info) The machine is idle only me doing the test via an ssh session. What do you suspect? I really dont know what it could

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
Only on write this is a read test. - Original Message - From: "Arne Wörner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Furthermore RAID-5 needs to read the parity block, before it can update that block, so that there are 2 disc transactions more, which could explain the better performance of a single disk, too?

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Wörner
--- Eric Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First, understand that RAID 5 is dependant on fast hardware to > performa > the XOR operations. A single disk without any RAID can easily > outperform a RAID array if the RAID array is on a 'slow' > controller. > The Highpoint controllers are not e

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Eric Anderson
Steven Hartland wrote: - Original Message - From: "Eric Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Where do I start looking? First, understand that RAID 5 is dependant on fast hardware to performa the XOR operations. A single disk without any RAID can easily outperform a RAID array if the RAID array

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
- Original Message - From: "Eric Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Where do I start looking? First, understand that RAID 5 is dependant on fast hardware to performa the XOR operations. A single disk without any RAID can easily outperform a RAID array if the RAID array is on a 'slow' contr

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Eric Anderson
Steven Hartland wrote: I've just finished putting together a new server box spec: Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA 400GB on a Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 array. The machine is currently running 5.4-STABLE ( from the weekend ) After install I did some basic tests and the disk is return very poor p

Re: Very low disk performance Highpoint 1820a

2005-04-28 Thread Steven Hartland
Sorry wanted to send to performance not current :) Steve - Original Message - I've just finished putting together a new server box spec: Dual AMD 244, 2GB ram, 5 * Seagate SATA 400GB on a Highpoint 1820a RAID 5 array. The machine is currently running 5.4-STABLE ( from the weekend ) Afte