Thomas Hurst wrote:
* martinko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
well, thanks for the switch. i couldn't find any
description/explanation of/on the columns (VCSW,..) in top(1) man
page, though. :(
VCSW = Voluntary Context Switch
IVCSW = Involuntary Context Switch
A very nice article on the meanin
What are the parameters that need to be tuned on amd64 platform to get,
say 1-1.5G buffer cache?
Pete
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
On Mon, 19 Sep 2005, Xin LI wrote:
It seems that Microsoft has recently revised several of their APIs. One
example is their ConnectEx(), as found in documentation [1]. The
implementation is not so complex that it just combines more operation
within one system call, however, this can reduce som
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Eric Anderson wrote:
I bought the array here:
http://www.acnc.com
The biggest RAID-5 we have is on one of those boxes. So far has performed
very well for us.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
On Thu, 22 Sep 2005, Chuck Swiger wrote:
So-so. RAID-5 is okay on a IMAP reader box, it's not so good for a pure SMTP
relay, especially one that does virus scanning.
For our SMTP I think we will have "small" machines with RAID-1
If your DB claims to support a RAID-5
Will check. Will be us
