Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Joao Barros
On 11/9/05, Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Joao, > > > Last month I started a thread[1] on current@ about this, but I guess I > > should have done it here, my apologies for that. > > > > After my initial post I did some more testing and I'm going to start > > clean here with all my

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Joao Barros
On 11/10/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my > > systems (FreeBSD-current connected directly to Windows XP via identical > > Intel Pro 1000 cards) and my only conclusion is

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Bradley W. Dutton
I recently upgraded to gigabit and was expecting faster Samba performance as well. I don't recall the exact numbers but net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack=0 did help quite a bit on my box. I too tried mtu (intel cards and SMC jumbo switch) and polling but the transfer rates would max out around 10megs/sec

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Joao Barros
On 11/10/05, Joao Barros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/10/05, Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote: > > > > > I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my > > > systems (FreeBSD-current connected directly to Windows XP via

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Joao Barros
On 11/9/05, Arkadi Shishlov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: > > On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results. > > I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a > > Windows 2003 Server while doing a cached read. > > I can get up to 70% bandw

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Joao Barros
On 11/9/05, Michael Vince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Joao Barros wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >Last month I started a thread[1] on current@ about this, but I guess I > >should have done it here, my apologies for that. > > > >After my initial post I did some more testing and I'm going to start > >clean h

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Nick Evans
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:48:14 -0500 Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Watson wrote: > > There are a number of TCP related configuration frobs on FreeBSD. It > > would be quite interesting to know how modifying each of the following > > settings affects Samba performance: > > > > n

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Mike Jakubik
Robert Watson wrote: There are a number of TCP related configuration frobs on FreeBSD. It would be quite interesting to know how modifying each of the following settings affects Samba performance: net.inet.tcp.delayed_ack net.inet.tcp.sack.enable net.inet.tcp.inflight.enable There has been r

Re: Poor Samba throughput on 6.0

2005-11-10 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Mike Jakubik wrote: I have done many tests to try to determine the poor performance on my systems (FreeBSD-current connected directly to Windows XP via identical Intel Pro 1000 cards) and my only conclusion is that Samba on FreeBSD when talking to a Windows box is simply fu