On Thu, 6 Apr 2006, Sven Petai wrote:
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 21:52, Mike Silbersack wrote:
If you're willing to spend more time looking at this, I suggest that you
run truss or ktrace on the super-smack processes. I did a small amount of
mysql vs postgres vs firebird benchmarking two yea
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 21:52, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> If you're willing to spend more time looking at this, I suggest that you
> run truss or ktrace on the super-smack processes. I did a small amount of
> mysql vs postgres vs firebird benchmarking two years ago for a class
> project, and not
I'm not subscribed to -performance, hence why this isn't a true reply...
I noticed that Steve said:
---
Looking at this on a dual box here ( waiting for the new MB for dual dual
core )
All the time is spent processing super-smack and only 25% on mysqld.
---
If you're willing to spend more ti
Looking at this on a dual box here ( waiting for the new MB for dual dual core )
All the time is spent processing super-smack and only 25% on mysqld.
Even dropping to 10 clients a large portion is take by the clients.
That said there is a lot that can be gained by using the tweaks out there
i.e. U
On Wednesday 05 April 2006 08:31, David Xu wrote:
>
> Can you disable log-bin option in my.cnf to see if it is a FS bottleneck
> when you are running update-smack ? please run Linux and FreeBSD
> with same hardware and my.cnf configuration, thanks.
> I know this is not very right, but it can be us
在 Wednesday 05 April 2006 00:42，Sven Petai 写道：
>
> hi
>
> Before I begin, let me just say that I'm probably aware most of the threads
> about mysql performance in various fbsd lists over last couple of years, so
> please let's not consentrate on the usual points made over and over again
> like
