On Tuesday 04 July 2006 06:21, David Xu wrote:
> For conroe, google the "fair-cache", you may find what should be done
> in scheduler, that's one of many reasons why I was saying libpthread should
> be stopped. Unless conroe is very special and does not need this
> work.
Here is one of such inter
On Tuesday 04 July 2006 02:40, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Michael Vince wrote:
> > HTT was Intels best early stab to help path the way for their multi
> > core technologies to come into use as quickly as possible for the
> > masses over just the server end.
>
> Exactly, thats why i wouldn't spend too mu
Michael Vince wrote:
HTT was Intels best early stab to help path the way for their multi
core technologies to come into use as quickly as possible for the
masses over just the server end.
Exactly, thats why i wouldn't spend too much time bothering with HTT. It
was a transitional technology fo
David Xu wrote:
Michael Vince wrote:
Hugo Silva wrote:
Today I decided to benchmark MySQL 5 performance on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE.
This server is a Dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB of RAM and 2x73GB SCSI disks
that do 320MB/s
For all the tests, I restarted mysqld prior to starting the test,
waited fo
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, David Xu wrote:
I found 5% performance decrease on dual P4, maybe P4 is quite bad when doing
atomic operation. ;-) Thanks,
When I've measured, generally, yes, P4 performance has been abysmal for
synchronization operations, both atomic operations and CPU-local interrupt
di
Michael Vince wrote:
Hugo Silva wrote:
Today I decided to benchmark MySQL 5 performance on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE.
This server is a Dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB of RAM and 2x73GB SCSI disks
that do 320MB/s
For all the tests, I restarted mysqld prior to starting the test,
waited for about 1 minute fo
Hugo Silva wrote:
Today I decided to benchmark MySQL 5 performance on FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE.
This server is a Dual Xeon 2.8GHz, 4GB of RAM and 2x73GB SCSI disks
that do 320MB/s
For all the tests, I restarted mysqld prior to starting the test,
waited for about 1 minute for it to settle down, an
On 07/03/06 14:17 David Xu said the following:
Please don't run mysql in PROC_SCOPE with libthr, it has no benefit and
can only hurt performance, you can forcely turn it off by:
still, libthr showed oodles better performance than libpthread. is this
indicative ?
--
Regards,
