Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Dave
On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Dave wrote: On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Dave
On Oct 25, 2006, at 2:35 AM, Divacky Roman wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:59:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the first results. The first tests are

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Dave wrote: > On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500, > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs > >>with different configurations on FreeB

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Dave
On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the first results. The first tests are

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Dave
On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the first results. The first tests are

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread gnn
At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs > with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the > first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. Thanks very much for thi

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Borja Marcos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:44:42 +0200): According to the bind9 port makefile, using threads is _not_ recommended. Specifically, it seems it's a recommendation from ISC It would be a good idea to add this note. It's good to experiment with performance

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Borja Marcos
I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. I added this to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkMatrix According to the bind9 port mak

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500): I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. I added this to http://w

Re: DNS Performance Numbers

2006-10-25 Thread Divacky Roman
On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 09:59:57PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs > with different configurations on FreeBSD and figured I would share the > first results. The first tests are for serving up static data. > > System: > Superm