Re: em forwarding performance (was Proposed 6.2 em RELEASE patch

2006-11-29 Thread Nick Pavlica
On 11/27/06, Mike Tancsa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: At 02:12 PM 11/25/2006, Nick Pavlica wrote: >>I might give OpenBSD a quick try as a reference. > >Mike, > Have you done any testing on Solaris 10, or OpenSolaris? I >understand that it has a very robust IP stack. It would be Did a quick defa

Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)

2006-11-29 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 04:35 PM 11/29/2006, Robert Watson wrote: You may want to datestamp the version of HEAD you're using in each test (assuming it changes between tests). Ahh, Good point. I have been using the sources always from Nov 24th to make comparisons as similar as possible for the tests with 7.0 wh

Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)

2006-11-29 Thread Robert Watson
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Mike Tancsa wrote: Did some more tests, this time using a single NIC interface in trunking mode. Strangely enough, the speed is a little faster on HEAD. Perhaps less interrupt processing ? Results in the usual place http://www.tancsa.com//blast.html You may want to dat

Re: vlan forwarding performance (was Proposed em forwawrding performance)

2006-11-29 Thread Mike Tancsa
Did some more tests, this time using a single NIC interface in trunking mode. Strangely enough, the speed is a little faster on HEAD. Perhaps less interrupt processing ? Results in the usual place http://www.tancsa.com//blast.html ---Mike __