Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

2008-02-13 Thread JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉
At Wed, 13 Feb 2008 13:06:58 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Of course. See the bindn1 files at the same location. (only the memory > section included) > The effect is pretty much the same. Okay, then please try this patch with '-n 1' (note: this patch doesn't contain the memory

Re: Performance Tracker project update

2008-02-13 Thread Antony Mawer
Erik Cederstrand wrote: Brooks Davis skrev: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:41:09AM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: I finally got around to testing this, and with a combination of mtree comparing md5 hashes, bsdiff compacting changed files and hardlinking unchanged files I get a reduction in size fr

Re: Performance Tracker project update

2008-02-13 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Dieter skrev: As suggested in other posts, deleting .pyo and .pyc files gets me down to 6MB. Static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib still have mismatching MD5 sums even though no source code change warrants this. Can I do anything about that? Perhaps they have an embedded ti

Re: Performance Tracker project update

2008-02-13 Thread Dieter
> As suggested in other posts, deleting .pyo and .pyc files gets me down to > 6MB. Static libraries (.a files) in /usr/lib and /usr/local/lib still have > mismatching MD5 sums even though no source code change warrants this. Can > I do anything about that? Perhaps they have an embedded timestamp o

Re: Performance Tracker project update

2008-02-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 03:46:10PM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Brooks Davis skrev: >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:41:09AM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: >>> I finally got around to testing this, and with a combination of mtree >>> comparing md5 hashes, bsdiff compacting changed files and hardl

Re: Performance Tracker project update

2008-02-13 Thread Erik Cederstrand
Brooks Davis skrev: On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 09:41:09AM +0100, Erik Cederstrand wrote: I finally got around to testing this, and with a combination of mtree comparing md5 hashes, bsdiff compacting changed files and hardlinking unchanged files I get a reduction in size from 256MB to 10MB. Pretty

Re: max-cache-size doesn't work with 9.5.0b1

2008-02-13 Thread Attila Nagy
On 02/12/08 18:55, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote: At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:10:12 +0100, Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Then named will listen on [your_ip_address]:some_port, and you can browse internal statistics by accessing http://[your_ip_address]:some_port with your browser. When you