benjamin thielsen wrote:
hi folks-
we've been experiencing some interesting behavior on single quad core
computers as compared to dual quad core computers.
Yes, this can happen when you run into concurrency bottlenecks in the
application or in the kernel.
it appears that adding a second pr
hi folks-
we've been experiencing some interesting behavior on single quad core
computers as compared to dual quad core computers.
it appears that adding a second processor to the system (leaving it
otherwise untouched) actually decreases performance. we've got a
small rudimentary test p
Hi!
After looking at humotous quoting about a man trying to ban unused addresses in
his network by putting 65535 ifcong_XXX_aliasYYY lines to rc.conf, I decided to
check this performance issue on a 6.2-RELEASE (GENERIC) and compare it with
Linux. Below are results from two machines.
First, I've f
patch (against RELENG_6) is at
http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch
pgpAKyOWoPWdr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
> GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
>
> Check for partially applied patch.
>
Thanks Kostik. You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear that
all file
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 03:02:44PM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
>
> Oops!
>
> ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c: In function `chkdq':
> ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: `do_check' undeclared (first use in
> this function)
> ../../../ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:168: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
Valerio Daelli wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Valerio Daelli wrote:
> As you can see they are much faster than NFS.
> Then I have done a test with a Solaris 10 client and a Solaris 10 server:
>
> ---
> SOLARIS
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17:00
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Valerio Daelli wrote:
>
> > As you can see they are much faster than NFS.
> > Then I have done a test with a Solaris 10 client and a Solaris 10 server:
> >
> > ---
> > SOLARIS
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] 17:00:34:~ /u
Valerio Daelli wrote:
As you can see they are much faster than NFS.
Then I have done a test with a Solaris 10 client and a Solaris 10 server:
---
SOLARIS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 17:00:34:~ /usr/local/bin/iozone -r 2m -+q 1 -i 0 -n 2048 -g
8m -Raceb iozone.xls -f
/mnt/nest.ifom-ieo-campus.it/iozone.s
> Can you post it somewhere for me to download and look at? I'm not sure
> my mail server will take a 30MB attachment :)
>
> Eric
>
>
Hi
I have done a test with rsync. These are the results:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/rsync RSYNC_PASSWORD='xxx' time rsync -av
rsync://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/data/FILE
10 matches
Mail list logo
