On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 06:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Paul Pathiakis wrote:
> The results came out like this:
>
> EXT3 - ~3000 tps
> EXT4 - ~3800 tps
> XFS - ~ 1800 tps
> ZFS - 75000 tps
ZFS seems very good at keeping the disk busy with lots of buffering - on
my machine gstat shows the disk at 100% for severa
I'm sorry. I didn't run it. I should have but a journal was required. I
could
have used FFS w GEOM Journal but I was winging this in my free time while
performing my "job". (Bored easily, and easily interested when something just
"feels" wrong) So, I went with ZFS due to the gobs of memory
