On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
>>> Now... in case someone here is will
On 12/22/11 17:56, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Guys, girls, fuzzy creatures,
>
> This is by far the best example of a constructive email in this entire thread.
Agreed!
>
> If people would like to help, Erik here is exactly the kind of person
> with exactly the kind of software that needs a hand.
>
>
On 12/22/11 10:56, Igor Mozolevsky wrote:
> On 22 December 2011 05:54, Daniel Kalchev wrote:
[...]
>> Any 'benchmark' has a goal. You first define the goal and then measure how
>> different contenders achieve it. Reaching the goal may have several
>> measurable metrics, that you will use to later
On 12/22/11 10:02, Johan Hendriks wrote:
> Stefan Esser schreef:
>> Am 21.12.2011 22:49, schrieb Johan Hendriks:
>>> Nice page, but one thing i do not get is the following.
>>>
>>> [quote]
>>> If you compare FreeBSD / GCC 4.2.1 against, for example, Ubuntu / GCC
>>> 4.7 then the results are unlikel
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
> > Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel
> > free to go to h
On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> while the discussion continued here, some work started at some other place.
> Now... in case someone here is willing to help instead of talking, feel free
> to go to http://wiki.freebsd.org/BenchmarkAdvice and have a look what can be
> imp
(Resending - hopefully without horrific escaping somewhere upstream).
Let me suggest an alternative.
Within the Phoronix Test Suite ecosystem, we have a continious
integration/validation system called Phoromatic
(http://www.phoromatic.com/). We have a brief theory of operation on it
captured
Let me suggest an alternative.
=
Within the Phoronix Test Suite ecosystem, we have a
continious
= integration/validation system called Phoromatic
([1]http://www.phoromatic.c= om/). We have a brief theory of
operation
on it captured
=
[2]https://docs.google.
Guys, girls, fuzzy creatures,
This is by far the best example of a constructive email in this entire thread.
If people would like to help, Erik here is exactly the kind of person
with exactly the kind of software that needs a hand.
I think enough philosophizing has been done - now we have questi
Den 21/12/2011 kl. 19.48 skrev Alexander Leidinger:
> And related to the subject: wasn't it you who developed the automatic
> benchmarking stuff? If yes, why not make it available? If you don't have he
> resources, I offer my help to make it available somewhere.
Yes, that's me. I'm mostly out o
10 matches
Mail list logo
