the channel setting from:
I've added this, so now the server doesn't log much (after start, noting):
category default{ null; };
The memory usage still grows.
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network
Sorry again for the long delay, I've got other work to do, and our 9.4
servers work fine (at least on FreeBSD 6, though, see the other
-performance- problem)...
On 02/20/08 04:30, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:59:15 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
On 2008.04.03. 15:21, Stefan Lambrev wrote:
Greetings,
Attila Nagy wrote:
On 01/29/08 11:40, Attila Nagy wrote:
ps: I have an other problem. I've recently switched from a last year
6-STABLE to 7-STABLE and got pretty bad results on the same machine
with the same bind (9.4).
The graph
On 01/29/08 11:40, Attila Nagy wrote:
ps: I have an other problem. I've recently switched from a last year
6-STABLE to 7-STABLE and got pretty bad results on the same machine
with the same bind (9.4).
The graphs are here:
http://picasaweb.google.com/nagy.attila/20080129Fbsd6vs7Bind
The pr
y usage
0x800f16000: mem inuse 7568776, overmem=1
Feb 19 13:57:27 cns00a named[45171]: database: info: ADB memory usage
0x8011e8000: mem inuse 65536, overmem=0
407 MB RES at this point...
(max-cache-size still 32M)
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free
On 02/12/08 18:55, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:10:12 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Then named will listen on [your_ip_address]:some_port, and you can
browse internal statistics by accessing
http://[your_ip_address]:some_port with your browser.
gly.
Here are the results:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/bind950-memory-20080212/
and at the end, the relevant line from top.
Is this FreeBSD leaking then?
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phon
em = overmem;
+ if (overmem != cache->cleaner.overmem) {
+ dns_db_overmem(cache->db, overmem);
+ cache->cleaner.overmem = overmem;
+ isc_mem_water(cache->mctx, mark);
+ }
UNLOCK(&cache->cleaner.lock);
}
S
On 2008.02.04. 20:36, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Sun, 03 Feb 2008 20:24:25 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, if bind was built with threads, the memory usage always grew behind
max-cache-size very quickly.
Here is the log:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/b
On 2008.01.30. 3:28, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
Okay, please use the attached patch (applicable to 9.5.0b1, and also
to 9.5.0b2 when it's published). Build it with:
% STD_CDEFINES='-DLRU_DEBUG2=2' ./configure --enable-threads
(or set STD_CDEFINES using setenv if you use a csh variant)
The log
On 2008.01.30. 3:28, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:40:39 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Without threading I don't see this effect, the memory usage stops at a
sane limit and it's size can be affected by setting the max-cache-size
option.
On 2008.01.28. 19:21, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Mon, 28 Jan 2008 17:10:28 +0100,
Attila Nagy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you have time, could you rebuild named as follows
% STD_CDEFINES='-DLRU_DEBUG' ./configure; make
and try again? This won't solve the prob
?
thr and with dynamically linked mysql, because when I link it with
-static, it dies with sig11 at startup.
You can find the updated picture at the previous link.
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630
:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/20060506a-uds-fine-grain.diff/domsock.png
The machine is a quad core Xeon LV server, the client side is sysbench,
accessing mysql 4.1.8 on a socket. Heap table, simple test.
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free
14 matches
Mail list logo
