e any suggestions, let me know. My
goal in testing was to see what was the best configuration for bind
and how it compared to Linux.
--
Dave
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
ox! Is there an explanation
why
FreeBSD performs so bad beyond 4.X and on SMP boxes? Please show me
threads ...
Thanks and regards,
Oliver
The FreeBSD pthread library and BIND don't work well together. If
you use the libthr library, performanc
On Oct 30, 2006, at 1:27 PM, Marcelo Gardini do Amaral wrote:
Dave, could you please describe you test set?
All the hardware is the same. Queryperf was run on a FreeBSD 6.1
box. Both boxes are connected through a Cisco switch. All connections
are gig, full duplex. Test was done with
On Oct 25, 2006, at 9:03 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Dave wrote:
On Oct 25, 2006, at 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:59:57 -0500,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am running some performance tests on named to see how it performs
, I created four kernels;
uni-processor, uni-processor with polling, multi-processor, multi-
processor with polling. The OS was as default as possible. For this
test, I didn't want to make many changes.
--
Dave
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org ma
VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on
isa0
Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master SATA150
acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
--
Dave
___
VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300>
vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa-0xb on
isa0
Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec
ad0: 76319MB at ata0-master SATA150
acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33
SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!
Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
--
Dave
___
