Il 29/04/13 14:20, Jia-Shiun Li ha scritto:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Davide D'Amico
wrote:
Hi, I'm doing performance tests on a DELL R720, follows dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
ents of freebsd-performance digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Davide D'Amico)
2. Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 [WAS Re: freebsd-performance
Digest, Vol 119, Issue 8] (Davide D'Ami
Il 25/03/13 18:11, Adrian Chadd ha scritto:
Can you please run a Linux install in a FreeBSD jail so we can see
whether it's the kernel or userland?
Sure, do you have a link on how to install gnu/linux on a fbsd jail?
Is ok if I use the VM I created in vmware (so it will be VMWARE ->
FreeBSD -
Il 25/03/13 15:00, Davide D'Amico ha scritto:
Thank you Daniel for your tests, here my tests using sysbench v0.5 MySQL
Benchmarks r/w (80%/20%) test on 10.000.000 rows 2.000.000 query using
Standard OLTP: values represent the number of transactions per second
and the first number is obt
Thank you Daniel for your tests, here my tests using sysbench v0.5 MySQL
Benchmarks r/w (80%/20%) test on 10.000.000 rows 2.000.000 query using
Standard OLTP: values represent the number of transactions per second
and the first number is obtained using 1 thread, the second one using 2
threads,
Ok, I'll try tomorrow and I'll post results here. Some particular parameter to
use?
Daniel Bilik ha scritto:
>On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:59:29 +0100
>Davide D'Amico wrote:
>
>> I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I have some chance to
>
Il 24.03.2013 07:10 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk ha scritto:
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Davide D'Amico
wrote:
Il 22.03.2013 16:56 Евгений Хоркин ha scritto:
Hi Davide!
Sorry if I do a reply 'here' but some posts where filtered by
antispam.
To Daniel Bilik: yes, I us
Il 22.03.2013 16:56 Евгений Хоркин ha scritto:
Hi Davide!
Sorry if I do a reply 'here' but some posts where filtered by antispam.
To Daniel Bilik: yes, I used the 'complex' OLTP tests, because more
similar to my production dataset/workload.
I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I
Il 23.03.2013 01:34 Paul Pathiakis ha scritto:
Hi,
There are several things about this that are highly suspect.
First, wipe out the hardware RAID. The processor doing RAID
computation is, probably, MUCH slower than a core on the CPU. Even if
it's RAID-1 (Simple Mirror) this RAID card is perform
from 1 to 48 threads in sysbench
oltp tests.
Thanks,
d.
"Евгений Хоркин" ha scritto:
>Hi Davide!
>
>Are you sure that disk is the bottleneck in your test?
>Does systat -vm 1 show 100% busy for disk ?
>
>Evgeny.
>
>
>2013/3/22 Davide D'Amico
>
>
Il 22/03/13 11:00, Traffanstead, Mike ha scritto:
May I ask why you're running ZFS on top of a RAID array? That's not
recommended. One of the advantages of ZFS is that it balance disk
activity across devices but when put it on top drives that at are
already raided it loses that insight and may
Hi, I'm doing performance tests on a DELL R720, follows dmesg:
Copyright (c) 1992-2012 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD is a registered trademark of The F
12 matches
Mail list logo
