Hi,
Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
--- Erich Dollansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
--- Erich Dollansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have had once the problem of a task moving from CPU to CPU and s
performing badly on FreeBSD.
I am not informed how this is handl
Hi,
Shantanu Ghosh wrote:
--- Erich Dollansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Don't you call memcpy?
Well, I first did - then I wrote a function to do the same, just to
make sure that the code executed is exactly the same in both the cases.
The difference was there both when using
Hi,
Nash Nipples wrote:
sounds like a power unit problem. try to switch them and repeat.
hey, in the next step you tell him that the MTU is set wrongly.
Now, in simple memory access operations, I see the freebsd system being
noticably slower than the linux system. A simple C program that co
Hi,
Martin Cracauer wrote:
For integer workloads Intel's Core2-base Xeons outperforms K8 (the
old-school AMD64) by about 25-30% per clock per core. K10 seems to be
5-15% faster than K8 for integer workloads (I hope to run my benchmark
suite on one thi week or weekend).
the guys at heise.de pu
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
processors, when running Unix?
AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising.
But not the dual core ve
Hi,
Palle Girgensohn wrote:
Now, I hear rumors that AMD is to be preferred over Intel for
performance reasons. Any comments on that? Are we better off getting AMD
processors, when running Unix?
AMD announced today the new quad core. Their benchmarks are promising.
But not the dual core ver
Hi,
Bill Moran wrote:
We have some database servers that we're looking to replace with
beefier hardware, mainly because we're expecting our customer base
to grow a lot in the near future.
The current hw is Dell 2850 servers. These are dual proc (each proc
is hyperthreaded) with Dell PERC cont
