the write penalty on
each read access.
We need more data :-)
--
Mark Felder
ports-secteam member
f...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Jul 8, 2014, at 5:58, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 27/06/2014 14:56, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I did some measurements and hacks to see about the performance and
>> scalability of PostgreSQL 9.3 on FreeBSD, sponsored by The FreeBSD
>> Foundation.
>>
>> The results are described in https
June 27 2014 7:56 AM, "Konstantin Belousov" wrote:
> Hi,
> I did some measurements and hacks to see about the performance and
> scalability of PostgreSQL 9.3 on FreeBSD, sponsored by The FreeBSD
> Foundation.
>
> The results are described in https://kib.kiev.ua/kib/pgsql_perf.pdf.
> The uncommi
On Wed, 03 Jul 2013 13:02:03 -0500, TJ wrote:
Well the server is not peaking in CPU its using about 50% and still has
8GB of RAM free.
Yes, i need it to send more email faster and use all the resource that
it has.
You will probably want to talk to people on the Exim lists because your
What kind of performance? CPU? Disk? Network? Do you need it to simply
send more mail faster?
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-perfo
On Thu, 13 Jun 2013 13:31:19 -0500, David O'Brien
wrote:
10-CURRENT results were in
http://people.freebsd.org/~obrien/jbm/vanitygen/vanity-perf-graph.png
as "fbsd10". Or are you suggesting something else?
Whoops, I missed fbsd10 on that graph. Sorry!
___
On Wed, 12 Jun 2013 17:58:49 -0500, David O'Brien
wrote:
We found FreeBSD 8.4 to perform better than FreeBSD 9.1, and Linux
considerably better than both on the same machine.
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=241246
The above link is likely why 8.4 is better than 9.1 on
Phoronix is The Onion of *nix journalism. It's cute, but you'd have to be
crazy to believe it.
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-perf
I've been talking to others and it seems that several of us are convinced
that BSD is back on the uptake, so I wouldn't be so quick to mark its
demise. :-)
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:58:32 -0600, Freddie Cash wrote:
Question 2:
FreeBSD 9.0 installable on ZFS root?
Yes.
This is now an option in the installer? It wasn't last time I checked, but
that was a while ago and last I heard it wasn't going to make it in...
I'll have to fire up the la
On Thu, 17 Nov 2011 12:26:49 -0600, list, mailing wrote:
Question 1:
With the ZFS snapshots what is the lost in drive space?
ZFS tracks the blocks that change. If you change 60GB of data, you'll lose
60GB of space. (roughly... there is probably some slight overhead but you
get the point)
On Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:19:30 -0600, Bruce Cran wrote:
People seem to forget that debugging is turned off before the RC builds
are done, which is what Phoronix tested (8.0 RC1).
The GENERIC kernel has DEBUG=-g enabled; perhaps this is what he is
referring to?
They certainly have earned the
I recommend posting this on the Postgres performance list, too.
Regards,
Mark
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsub
13 matches
Mail list logo
