A few of us FreeBSD/powerpc64 fans are watching the developments
closely.
mcl
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr..
Thank you for doing this work.
mcl
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-performance-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I have slightly reordered your email in my reply, in order to put the
most important item last.
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:01:33PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
> I'm still with the system, although I desperately need scientific grade
> compilers or GPGPU support.
Your use-case, while valid, is clear
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:45:09PM +0800, Paul Ambrose wrote:
> 3 There is a missing feature list about DTrace, but no schedule list about
> when to fix it.
We just need someone who wants to spend a lot of time working on it.
Without that, there is no point in putting up a schedule.
mcl
> > * I am trying to understand what is different about the ISC
> > configuration but have not yet found the cause.
> It's called "Anti-FreeBSD bias". You won't find anything.
If this is true, please try to explain to me the following:
- ISC hosts 5 Netra 1s that comprise most of our sparc64 p
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 02:01:08PM -0400, Michael Butler wrote:
> For everyone's benefit then, please feel free to submit your patches
> along with your technical analysis.
I think his best bet is a fork, instead. Then he can tell all the people
that volunteer to work on _his_ project exactly wha
On Sun, Oct 15, 2006 at 07:57:32AM -0700, Danial Thom wrote:
> Stating facts is not trolling.
true, but ...
> The fact that you may not want to hear it is your own problem [...]
> You can't keep promoting this junk they're putting out. You can't just
> keep kicking the Matt Dillons out of the cam
