Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
>>
>> But also I checked the ULE/BSD against my particular problem and there
>> is
>> no difference at all. I get no acceptable disk read performance when
>> comparing what I had with 4.11, wether with ULE or with 4BSD
>
> Be very careful, because I've perso
Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 04:58:06PM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
>
>> I have two server, the main server is a Supermicro Dualcore Dual Opteron
>> and the backup is a Athlon64 X2, both with 4GB
>>
>> The disks are the same, on
Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 03:41:21PM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
>>
>> Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
>> > On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
>> >
>> >> I forgot to say t
Kris Kennaway disse na ultima mensagem:
> On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 09:53:47AM -0200, Michel Santos wrote:
>
>> I forgot to say that I tried it already. Even if it gave me no
>> improvement
>> I have it in 16 at this time together with a higher
>> vfs.ufs.dirhash_ma
Mark Kirkwood disse na ultima mensagem:
> Michel Santos wrote:
>> I hope somebody can help me. I upgraded recently my cache server (squid)
>> 4.11 to 6.2
>>
>> I notice that my disk read performance seems to be low. I observe it by
>> reading diskio from net-snmp
I hope somebody can help me. I upgraded recently my cache server (squid)
4.11 to 6.2
I notice that my disk read performance seems to be low. I observe it by
reading diskio from net-snmp. I started to check this because my old
server gave much better results from cache.
I see read access as 1/4 -
