> This is interesting. I have had a couple of laptop users report success
> in using lower power saving modes with ULE. Are these core temp
> observations repeatable?
>
> Thanks,
> Jeff
>
> >
> > Thanks again for all your help! Please let me know if/when I can do
> > anything else to help out
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:39:29 -0400
"Josh Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 5-6% is a lot. ULE has some tuning for makeworld in -current, which
> > for me reduced it to less than 1% slower than 4BSD (down from 5-10%
> > slower), for the case of makeworld -j4 over nfs on a 2-CPU system with
>
On Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:39:52 -0400
"Josh Carroll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > kern.sched.steal_thresh is/was one of the more effective tuning sysctls.
> > rev 1.205 of sched_ule had a change that was supposed to automatically
> > adjust it based on the number of cores. Is this the same 8 core s
On Sun, 1 Jul 2007 22:47:33 -0700 (PDT)
Jeff Roberson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fixed a major bug in SCHED_SMP that impacted some users causing bad
> performance and invalid load counts. Attilio also added support for i386
> based machines. I have tested on UP which works although INVARIA
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 20:52:51 -0400 (EDT)
"Jerry Bell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a Dell PE2950 with 2 dual core 3.73Ghz processors and 4G of ram.
> I've looked through some of the lists here and have seen super-smack
> results in the 42k qps range on a 2 dual core opteron system. I'm abl
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:19:49 +0200
Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:42:41PM -0400, Nick Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
> > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nick Evans wrote:
>
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Evans wrote:
> > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in
> >> mind.
> >
> >
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:51:19 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Zacharias wrote:
> > Btw. the same problem exists on MAC OSX, as OSX also uses a BSD Kernel
> > the problem might be, that samba was optimized for the linux kernel
> > tcp stack.
>
> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has
> >
>
> I have the same issue here on several different systems. I have not been
> able to get throughput past ~70 megabits. Most times smbd hovers around
> 5-10% CPU usage on a Duron 1200 system. With this one system upgrading from
> a P2-350, to an Athlon 900 to the Duron 1200 have not changed p
On Thu, 25 May 2006 10:42:11 -0700 (PDT)
Nash Nipples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> has anyone actually managed to speed up the thing up to 10-12 MB/s
>
> i have a good 7-9 MB/s on large files and that should be enough, but still,
> out of curiosity?
>
> Oh by the way:
> 100 MB et
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 10:58:43 -0800
"Gustavo A. Baratto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The numbers are roughly the same with HTT disabled. For example for libthr:
>
> HTT disabled:
> ---
> # date; for i in 1 2 3 4 5; do super-smack select-key-mysql.smack 10 1000 |
> grep select_index; done
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005 07:48:14 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Robert Watson wrote:
> > There are a number of TCP related configuration frobs on FreeBSD. It
> > would be quite interesting to know how modifying each of the following
> > settings affects Samba performance:
> >
> > n
On Wed, 09 Nov 2005 17:24:18 -0500
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arkadi Shishlov wrote:
> > Joao Barros wrote:
> >
> >> On a P4 3.06GHz with HTT enabled and ULE I get the same results.
> >> I get a flat line at 58% looking at the bandwith in task manager on a
> >> Windows 2003 Serve
27;s*2 for thread_concurrency
thread_concurrency = 8
# max conns
max_connections=8000
On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 17:00:44 -0400
Nick Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried this on my dual opteron test rig and didn't notice a difference
> in performance with noatime set. Wha
I just tried this on my dual opteron test rig and didn't notice a difference
in performance with noatime set. What did make a difference was moving from
fxp to bge network cards. bge supports checksum offloading where fxp only
supports interrupt bundling. Freed up another 20% idle during my test ru
15 matches
Mail list logo
