> This is interesting. I have had a couple of laptop users report success > in using lower power saving modes with ULE. Are these core temp > observations repeatable? > > Thanks, > Jeff > > > > > Thanks again for all your help! Please let me know if/when I can do > > anything else to help out. > > > > Regards, > > Josh > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
After this was mentioned I tried coretemp on my 8-core system and am seeing the same behavior. Idle: dev.cpu.0.temperature: 48 dev.cpu.1.temperature: 45 dev.cpu.2.temperature: 41 dev.cpu.3.temperature: 41 dev.cpu.4.temperature: 44 dev.cpu.5.temperature: 44 dev.cpu.6.temperature: 41 dev.cpu.7.temperature: 42 After 10-15 minutes of 8 distributed.net crunchers running: dev.cpu.0.temperature: 63 dev.cpu.1.temperature: 59 dev.cpu.2.temperature: 55 dev.cpu.3.temperature: 54 dev.cpu.4.temperature: 58 dev.cpu.5.temperature: 59 dev.cpu.6.temperature: 56 dev.cpu.7.temperature: 56 Interesting distribution. Cores 2, 3, 6 and 7 consistently run cooler than 0, 1, 4 and 5. This behavior has been consistent since I started looking at it a few days ago. Is there anyway to tell which package a particular core is attached to or is it sequential 0-3 on package 1, 4-7 on package 2? Nick _______________________________________________ freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
