,
Kojedzinszky Richard
Euronet Magyarorszag Informatikai Zrt.
On Tue, 17 Apr 2012, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 22:57:09 +0200
From: Edward Tomasz Napierała
To: Adrian Chadd
Cc: Richard Kojedzinszky ,
Garrett Cooper , freebsd-secur...@freebsd.org,
freebsd-performance
12 13:35:59 -0700
From: Garrett Cooper
To: O. Hartmann
Cc: freebsd-secur...@freebsd.org, Richard Kojedzinszky ,
Current FreeBSD ,
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ufs multilabel performance (fwd)
On Apr 15, 2012, at 1:17 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 04/15/12 22:00, schrieb Ga
D|SIGTTIN|SIGTTOU|SIGIO|SIGXCPU|SIGXFSZ|SIGVTALRM|SIGPROF|SIGWINCH|SIGINFO|SIGUSR1|SIGUSR2,0x0)
= 0 (0x0)
0.23746 sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK,0x0,0x0) = 0 (0x0)
-1.24294 process exit, rval = 0
Maybe the factor is not this much in real installations, not as in my
domU, but still it is slow.
R
Dear List,
I've noticed that when I enable multilabel on an fs, a file creation gets
around 20-30 times slower than without multilabel set.
This one-liner can be used to test the differences:
$ truss -D perl -e 'open(F, ">$_.file") for 1 .. 1000'
And one can see that the open call takes much
