Hello,
from the error message originator - env(1) -, I´d say there´s some
environment variable missing at run. Crond does not execute ~/.profile
and similars, which is normally where these variables are defined, and
then they must be set by the shellscript itself.
In short, mrtg is being cal
t way for nearly a month now so time to send it back
and move to another manufacture.
Steve / K
- Original Message - From: "Tulio Guimarães da Silva"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 19 October 2005 14:29
Subject: Re: SATA: RAID 5 controller recommendations
For price/ben
For price/benefit, I too recommend the HPTs, specially the 1820A. It´s
not THE killer for speed, but it´s fairly stable, factory-supported on
FBSD, has good management utils (including remote, via daemon) and is
about half the price of its competitors. Besides, the "A" model has its
own XOR pr
Phew, thanks for that. :) This seems to answer my question in the
other "leg" of the thread, though it hadn´t yet arrived to me when I
wrote the message, though.
Now THAT´s a quite good explanation. ;) Thanks again,
Tulio G. da Silva
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Patrick Proniewsk
Steven Hartland wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Arne Wörner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
That seems to be 2 or about 2 times faster than disc->disc
transfer... But still slower, than I would have expected...
SATA150 sounds like the drive can do 150MB/sec...
LOL, you might want to read up
ril/May dealing with poor
read/write results on 5.x branch.. the primary "target" was RAID, but
maybe there´s a bunch of possible tuneups that may be applied to IDE and
SCSI disks. Have you tried´em?
Sorry again for the blatant misunderstanding.
Tulio G. Silva
Tulio Guimarães d
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 07:49:39PM +0200 I heard the voice of
JG, and lo! it spake thus:
Anyway, it's only a few secs difference, so the problem must be with
write. Any other hints? :)
Gentoo is using GNU tar, 5.4 is using bsdtar. Try installing gtar on
Free
Hi,
I´ve got the same kind of problem, not only with DDS-[234] tapes, but
also with "all-powerful-with-bells-and-whistles" AIT-3 units, with
controllers ranging from Adaptec stock 2940 to PCI-X Ultra-320... almost
same results.
The problems seems to lie in tar itself; I read there´s something
A bit late, but... :)
Shane Ambler wrote:
On 18/8/05 12:40 AM, "Shane Ambler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
n 17/8/05 9:43 PM, "Claus Guttesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Apart from apache there is sendmail and ssh running (and the basics such as
tty's, cron and syslog)
All pages are php.
Dumb me, forgot do redirect to the list. Sorry for that.
Tulio G. Silva
Original Message
Subject:Re: [RFC] Bumping ufs.dirhash_maxmem to a larger value?
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 11:08:49 -0300
From: Tulio Guimarães da Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Xin LI &
10 matches
Mail list logo
