On 23/12/2011 20:23, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
>> On 23/12/2011 02:56, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> There is a wiki page http://wiki.freebsd.org/SystemTuning which is
>> currently more or less tuning(7) with some annotations,
On 23/12/2011 02:56, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Dec 22, 2011, at 3:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 12:44:14AM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> On 12/21/11 19:41, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
while the discussion continued here, some work started at some oth
On 21/12/2011 16:45, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
> On 21/12/2011 15:29, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
>> Den 21/12/2011 kl. 15.20 skrev Randy Schultz:
>>
>>> I agree whole-heartedly. I guess I wasn't clear. I wasn't trying to say
>>> most
>>> SA'
On 21/12/2011 15:29, Erik Cederstrand wrote:
> Den 21/12/2011 kl. 15.20 skrev Randy Schultz:
>
>> I agree whole-heartedly. I guess I wasn't clear. I wasn't trying to say
>> most
>> SA's never tune, only that from watching other SA's over the years, little
>> tuning is done.
> As a casual SA, I o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/12/2011 13:47, O. Hartmann wrote:
>
>> Not fully right, boinc defaults to run on idprio 31 so this isn't an
>> issue. And yes, there are cases where SCHED_ULE shows much better
>> performance then SCHED_4BSD. [...]
>
> Do we have any proof at ha
On 18/10/2011 16:24, Ivan Klymenko wrote:
> В Tue, 18 Oct 2011 23:02:47 +0800
> Adrian Chadd пишет:
>
>> What is FBFS?
>>
>>
>>
>> Adrian
> :)
> http://rudot.blog.com/
or
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RudolfTomori/rudotSoC2011
The blog entry was interesting in that it gives some context to the 2
image
On 19/11/2010 12:42, Eric Masson wrote:
> Bruce Cran writes:
>
> Hello,
>
>> Google suggests that the work was a GSoC project in 2005 on a pluggable
>> disk scheduler.
> It seems that something similar has found its way in DFlyBSD, dsched.
And indeed to FreeBSD, man gsched. Added sometime round Ap
Looks a little like
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-all/2010-May/023679.html
but for intel. cool.
Vince
On 07/05/2010 23:01, grarpamp wrote:
> Just wondering in general these days how close FreeBSD is to
> full 10Gb rates at various packet sizes from minimum ethernet
> frame to max jumb
