Hi,
On 12/1/05, Gustavo A. Baratto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> DMESG:
> --
> Features2=0x4400>
> Hyperthreading: 2 logical CPUs
Would you have a try of disabling HTT? It harms performance for
certain applications.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI <
p?url=/library/en-us/winsock/winsock/connectex_2.asp
Cheers,
--
Xin LI http://www.delphij.net/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
bsd.org/~ssouhlal/stuff/
> compare_tiger-3.html .
> It shows that RELENG_6 and HEAD are (in these tests) almost never
> slower than RELENG_5, and often more than 20% faster.
Great work! BTW. Is there any clue about why pthread_128 looks slower
than RELENG_5 and then recovered in HEA
having 1000+ files in most
of them, then raising the dirhash_maxmem will be a great help for
performance.
I think it would be great if we can implement a automatical "suggested
value" of dirhash during bootstrap stage, though, which can be overridden
through sysctl.conf or subse
axmem value to at least
32MB or 64MB. Any objections?
Cons for this, discussed in -developer:
- dirhash does not implements automatical mechanism to reduce memory
usage in response to system memory pressure, and benefits mainly to
large directories, e.g. Maildirs.
Cheers,
--
Xin LI