It wouldn't surprise me in the slightest that ext3 is better albeit
bursty for writes. That's the Linux aggressive write-behind and
ext2/ext3 for you in a nutshell. It's also quite likely true that in
many cases that reads and I/O scheduling is a lot better in Linux.
If you have time to run some
On Tue, 15 May 2007, Matthew Jacob spaketh thusly:
-}filesystem? ext3?
Correct.
-}
-}I want one of these failing machines *in my lab*.
-}
-}On 5/14/07, Randy Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-}> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Matthew Jacob spaketh thusly:
-}>
-}> -}Time frame to resolution involves get
filesystem? ext3?
I want one of these failing machines *in my lab*.
On 5/14/07, Randy Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Matthew Jacob spaketh thusly:
-}Time frame to resolution involves getting a machine into my lab that
-}evidences the poor performance and the time to so
On Fri, 11 May 2007, Matthew Jacob spaketh thusly:
-}Time frame to resolution involves getting a machine into my lab that
-}evidences the poor performance and the time to sort out what the
-}problem is and fix it. Remote access doesn't work for me on this one
-}(contact me offline as to why).
Hey
