On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:13:19PM -0700, Sean McNeil wrote:
> Greg Lewis wrote:
> >On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:09:34AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> >>On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:59:12PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> >>
> >>>Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>>
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12
Greg Lewis wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:09:34AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:59:12PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Hey All,
I been benchmarking Diablo Jav
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 03:09:34AM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:59:12PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> > Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> > >
> > >>Hey All,
> > >>I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 04:59:12PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> >
> >>Hey All,
> >>I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
> >>methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat h
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
Hey All,
I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat here
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2006-August/005576.html
Th
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:32:53PM +1000, Michael Vince wrote:
> Hey All,
> I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
> methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat here
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2006-August/005576.html
>
> The difference her
Hey All,
I been benchmarking Diablo Java under AMD64 on 6.2R and using the same
methods I posted a while ago detailed somewhat here
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-java/2006-August/005576.html
The difference here is that libthr now works under Amd64.
But it appears libthr to be about