On Wed, 30 Jul 2008, Alexander Strange wrote:
On Jul 21, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
Alexander Strange wrote:
And there's no firewalls or packet shapers in front of it.
How about on it? Do you run ipfw?
No, I wouldn't answer a question so specifically like that.
We didn't see th
On Jul 21, 2008, at 3:53 PM, Ivan Voras wrote:
Alexander Strange wrote:
And there's no firewalls or packet shapers in front of it.
How about on it? Do you run ipfw?
No, I wouldn't answer a question so specifically like that.
We didn't see this problem after recompiling without SMP suppor
Alexander Strange wrote:
And there's no firewalls or packet shapers in front of it.
How about on it? Do you run ipfw?
___
freebsd-performance@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-performance
To unsubscribe, send
On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:44 PM, Sean Chittenden wrote:
-messages is full of:
Limiting open port RST response from 441 to 200 packets/sec
Limiting open port RST response from 488 to 200 packets/sec
Limiting open port RST response from 399 to 200 packets/sec
Limiting open port RST response from 434
Alexander Strange wrote:
We're running a rather high-load webserver using FreeBSD
7-RELEASE/amd64/nginx on an Intel em gigabit connection.
Performance is good for our current bandwidth use (about 20Mbit and
~2000 connections/sec at the moment), but a large number of HTTP
requests are being imme
Hi!
Something to read:
http://people.freebsd.org/~hmp/utilities/satbl/sysctl-net.html
I have these in the sysctl.conf
kern.ipc.somaxconn=4096
net.inet.tcp.recvspace=78840
net.inet.tcp.sendspace=78840
kern.ipc.shmmax=67108864
kern.ipc.shmmni=200
kern.ipc.shmseg=128
kern.ipc.semmni=70
net.local
We're running a rather high-load webserver using FreeBSD 7-RELEASE/
amd64/nginx on an Intel em gigabit connection.
Performance is good for our current bandwidth use (about 20Mbit and
~2000 connections/sec at the moment), but a large number of HTTP
requests are being immediately dropped before
