mc> Also make sure that you don't use a giant-locked driver
mc> somewhere in the chain to the filessystem and that WITNESS
mc> and friends are off. Is this a SMP machine?
As a general suggestion, you can use hwpmc(4) and pmcstat(8)
to understand where the bottlenecks are. For example, you
can c
Jan Zacharias wrote on Fri, Sep 29, 2006 at 05:28:27PM +0200:
> Hi Olivier,
>
> generally the Samba performance on *BSD just sucks,
> I wrote to this list with the same problem some weeks ago,
> no one was able to tune smbd so that it would outperform
> as well as under linux.
I haven't seen pre
In response to Nick Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'd start with plain ktrace and look in the trace to check for 'suspicious
> > things'. It might be something trivial like calling gettimeofday() way too
> > often as it was with mysql
>
> Done. I can provide the tracefile if anyone is intere
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 08:19:49 +0200
Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:42:41PM -0400, Nick Evans wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
> > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Nick Evans wrote:
> > > > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
On Mon, Oct 02, 2006 at 12:42:41PM -0400, Nick Evans wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
> Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Nick Evans wrote:
> > > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in
>
On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 10:30:23 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nick Evans wrote:
> > Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in
> >> mind.
> >
> > It should be possible to profile smbd and see where the
Nick Evans wrote:
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in mind.
It should be possible to profile smbd and see where the bottleneck is, no?
Has anyone tried it?
It should be, but i don't believe anyone has trie
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 12:51:19 -0400
Mike Jakubik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Zacharias wrote:
> > Btw. the same problem exists on MAC OSX, as OSX also uses a BSD Kernel
> > the problem might be, that samba was optimized for the linux kernel
> > tcp stack.
>
> Quite possibly, just as MySQL has
Hi Olivier,
generally the Samba performance on *BSD just sucks,
I wrote to this list with the same problem some weeks ago,
no one was able to tune smbd so that it would outperform
as well as under linux.
The only solution is to migrate your fileserver to a Linux distribution
as I did. Performanc
Jan Zacharias wrote:
Btw. the same problem exists on MAC OSX, as OSX also uses a BSD Kernel
the problem might be, that samba was optimized for the linux kernel
tcp stack.
Quite possibly, just as MySQL has been written with Linux primarily in mind.
_
Hi all,
Jan Zacharias a écrit :
generally the Samba performance on *BSD just sucks,
The only solution is to migrate your fileserver to a Linux distribution
as I did.
Olivier being the main developper/maintainer of FreeNAS, this is not an
option 8)
(bravo au fait)
David.
--
A: Yes.
>Q:
Hi Olivier,
generally the Samba performance on *BSD just sucks,
I wrote to this list with the same problem some weeks ago,
no one was able to tune smbd so that it would outperform
as well as under linux.
The only solution is to migrate your fileserver to a Linux distribution
as I did. Performanc
Olivier Cochard-Labbe wrote:
Hi all,
I meet a performance problem with my customized distro of FreeBSD
6.1(FreeNAS).
Lot's of FreeNAS users compare the performance of FreeNAS with Linux, and
the Samba performance are very poor under FreeNAS (but not with NFS or
FTP).
...
But there is no
Hi all,
I meet a performance problem with my customized distro of FreeBSD 6.1(FreeNAS).
Lot's of FreeNAS users compare the performance of FreeNAS with Linux, and
the Samba performance are very poor under FreeNAS (but not with NFS or FTP).
I've use this value on the default samba configuration:
14 matches
Mail list logo
