On 08/02/2021 11:21, Vladilen Kozin wrote:
These are excellent pointers and get me on my way! Thank you very much
Walter. Invaluable.
As a general note perhaps you may be interested in the stats(7) manual page.
And the dwatch utility.
___
freebsd-p
These are excellent pointers and get me on my way! Thank you very much
Walter. Invaluable.
On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 15:55, Walter von Entferndt
wrote:
>
> At Sonntag, 7. Februar 2021, 13:00:04 CET Vladilen Kozin
> wrote:
> > [1 dedicated disk/ufs per thread, no redundency,...]
>
> RTFM tuning(7), z
On 2/7/2021 10:50 AM, Walter von Entferndt wrote:
>
> - Inserting an I/O scheduler might improve performance, too (gsched(8)).
> Yes, UFS is likely faster than ZFS on such a setup, but ZFS offers many
> advantages in terms of administration, fault tolerance & reliability.
Especially if the data i
At Sonntag, 7. Februar 2021, 13:00:04 CET Vladilen Kozin
wrote:
> [1 dedicated disk/ufs per thread, no redundency,...]
RTFM tuning(7), zpool(8), zfs(8), gjournal(8), gstripe(8), gsched(8).
- Obviously striping the disks will be beneficial, but it seems you
don't want that (not enough disks?)
Hello list.
I have a rather niche and specific task I'm trying to tune for my
recently acquired homelab server. Easily parallelized, extremely disk
IO (write) intensive. If having read this you think it belongs in
freebsd-questions, kindly tell me so.
I've not used FreeBSD for 20 years, so I'm no
