At 04:31 AM 1/30/2008, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I forgot to mention in my first post that I'm using ULE. The p800
controller has a (factory set) 25/75 read/write cache ratio.
There's maybe one additional thing: do you dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD?
If so, you'll need to set up a
> Just a thought on the effect that HZ has on filesystem (and overall)
> performance :
> Linux has sort of backtracked from defaulting to HZ=1000 and enable it
> only on kernels compiled
> for "Desktop" work, and setting HZ=250 for the "Server" profile.
I'm doing some db-imports on postgresql on a
On 31/01/2008, Niki Denev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 31, 2008 10:16 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Niki Denev wrote:
> >
> > > HZ=1000
> > > Time:
> > > 239 seconds total
> > > 122 seconds of transactions (4 per second)
> >
> > > What do you think?
> >
> > Th
On Jan 31, 2008 10:16 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Niki Denev wrote:
>
> > HZ=1000
> > Time:
> > 239 seconds total
> > 122 seconds of transactions (4 per second)
>
> > What do you think?
>
> This is a very low result :) I don't know your machine or the parameters
> yo
Niki Denev wrote:
HZ=1000
Time:
239 seconds total
122 seconds of transactions (4 per second)
What do you think?
This is a very low result :) I don't know your machine or the parameters
you used with postmark but even FreeBSD on two striped 7.5 kRPM drives
can achieve ~~ 11
On Jan 30, 2008 9:57 PM, Ivan Voras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30/01/2008, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rewrite of the lockmgr primitive, for starters. Then we'll see what
> > remains.
>
> Ok, I know about the lockmgr efforts, and they will surely help some
> loads. I'll try
On 30/01/2008, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rewrite of the lockmgr primitive, for starters. Then we'll see what
> remains.
Ok, I know about the lockmgr efforts, and they will surely help some
loads. I'll try to compile the results I've been talking about in a
few days and post them
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Write performance is something that we are working on, expect to hear
about progress over the coming weeks/months.
Do you have some notes or descriptions about what is being worked on?
I'm currently doing some file system benchmarking for internal purpos
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Write performance is something that we are working on, expect to hear
> about progress over the coming weeks/months.
Do you have some notes or descriptions about what is being worked on?
I'm currently doing some file system benchmarking for internal purposes
and I'm seeing
Claus Guttesen wrote:
I forgot to mention in my first post that I'm using ULE. The p800
controller has a (factory set) 25/75 read/write cache ratio.
There's maybe one additional thing: do you dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD?
If so, you'll need to set up a separate additional partition for the
databa
Mike Tancsa wrote:
At 03:46 PM 1/28/2008, Claus Guttesen wrote:
I had (allready) saved the thread in my mail-account so I could look
it up before I started testing. :-) So I compiled postgresql with the
option WITH_THREADSAFE=true and used sysbench with --pgsql-host="" .
As pointed out by Ivan
At 03:46 PM 1/28/2008, Claus Guttesen wrote:
I had (allready) saved the thread in my mail-account so I could look
it up before I started testing. :-) So I compiled postgresql with the
option WITH_THREADSAFE=true and used sysbench with --pgsql-host="" .
As pointed out by Ivan my test also involve
> >I had (allready) saved the thread in my mail-account so I could look
> >it up before I started testing. :-) So I compiled postgresql with the
> >option WITH_THREADSAFE=true and used sysbench with --pgsql-host="" .
> >As pointed out by Ivan my test also involved r/w whereas the thread
> >you (pro
> > I forgot to mention in my first post that I'm using ULE. The p800
> > controller has a (factory set) 25/75 read/write cache ratio.
>
> There's maybe one additional thing: do you dual-boot Linux and FreeBSD?
> If so, you'll need to set up a separate additional partition for the
> database, inste
> I had (allready) saved the thread in my mail-account so I could look
> it up before I started testing. :-) So I compiled postgresql with the
> option WITH_THREADSAFE=3Dtrue and used sysbench with --pgsql-host=3D"" =
=2E
> As pointed out by Ivan my test also involved r/w whereas the thread
> you (
> Ubuntu 7.10:
>
> grep "transactions:" sysbench-clients-24|sort
> transactions:1 (2354.49 per sec.)
> transactions:10001 (2126.28 per sec.)
> transactions:10001 (2215.52 per sec.)
> tr
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Ubuntu 7.10:
grep "transactions:" sysbench-clients-24|sort
transactions:1 (2354.49 per sec.)
transactions:10001 (2126.28 per sec.)
transactions:10001 (2215.52 per sec.)
transactions:
> > > Ubuntu 7.10:
> > >
> > > grep "transactions:" sysbench-clients-24|sort
> > > transactions:1 (2354.49 per sec.)
> > > transactions:10001 (2126.28 per sec.)
> > > transactions:10001 (2215.52 per sec.)
> > > transacti
On Monday 28 January 2008 09:25:13 Ivan Voras wrote:
> Claus Guttesen wrote:
> > Ubuntu 7.10:
> >
> > grep "transactions:" sysbench-clients-24|sort
> > transactions:1 (2354.49 per sec.)
> > transactions:10001 (2126.28 per sec.)
> > transactions:
Claus Guttesen wrote:
Ubuntu 7.10:
grep "transactions:" sysbench-clients-24|sort
transactions:1 (2354.49 per sec.)
transactions:10001 (2126.28 per sec.)
transactions:10001 (2215.52 per sec.)
transactions:
Hi.
I have a HP DL360 G5 with a p800 controller with 512 bbwc and a msa70
cabinet with eight 15K rpm sas-disks in raid 1+0. I installed FreeBSD
7.0 stable and ubuntu 7.10 server using postgresql 8.2.5 (from ports
on FreeBSD and as an install-option on ubuntu). Both releases are
amd64. Postgresql o
21 matches
Mail list logo
