Hi,
I installed ports from the xorg7.2 tarball (KDE, Opera, Firefox,
Claws-mail, datastudio, gmplayer, xmss, softmaker-office, ... ) on my
desktop.
This was a clean install, on a newly installed CURRENT.
The list of ports is here:
http://sce-tindy.tecnik93.com/FreeBSD/div/installed_ports.txt
On Fri, 18 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:30:32PM +0200, Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 ? 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?crivait?:
We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
developers to participate in this process:
Howdy,
I've been working on a new version of portmaster to address the
problems exposed in the last gettext upgrade, as well as some other
issues. It's available at http://dougbarton.us/portmaster
I have not yet implemented the save old shared libs option, that
will come next assuming no
On Fri, 18 May 2007, James Snyder wrote:
Regarding the trials and tribulations. I did not, at first, get the message
that one shouldn't overlay the testing tree on top of the older tree, and did
the first libXft upgrade at that point. That failed and subsequently I
needed to do a series
--
Giancarlo Rubio
Linux is for people who hate Windows,
BSD is for people who love UNIX
Freebsd-BR User #88
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
--On May 19, 2007 10:27:36 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't sym-link /usr/X11R6 (for testing), but something creates an
empty /usr/X11R6/share/locale/.
Looks like that would be gettext:
grep -r {X11BASE}/share/locale ports/*
ports/devel/gettext/Makefile: @${MKDIR}
For those of you who didn't follow the thread where we did this, Alexander
Leidinger and I have made modifications to the port registration process
that make it significantly faster for ports with many dependencies. Sorry
for tooting our horn a bit, but I am really excited about this and I
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 12:05:07PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
--On May 19, 2007 10:27:36 AM +0300 Ion-Mihai Tetcu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I didn't sym-link /usr/X11R6 (for testing), but something creates an
empty /usr/X11R6/share/locale/.
Looks like that would be gettext:
grep -r
The problem with sdl12 was related to evas port. If DirectFB rendering
is enabled in graphics/evas, then devel/sdl does not compile and gives
the error I reported.
I disabled the DirectFB rendering in evas, and sdl installed correctly.
The other ones failed again, but I hope after a few
On Fri, 18 May 2007 12:18:31 -0500
Scot Hetzel [EMAIL PROTECTED] mentioned:
On 5/18/07, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How do I configure trac to use mysql rather than sqlite??
You'll need to make the following changes to the ports Makefile:
1. Add `MYSQLUse MySQL
As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the past
few months to upgrade X.org ports to 7.2. After a couple of weeks of
testing, we've finally committed this upgrade. We also decided to make
the PREFIX merge at the same time (moving X11BASE into LOCALBASE), which
explains why
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, are we there
yet?
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety of
ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3 and
sysutils/eject, which contain security issues affecting
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, are we there
yet?
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety
of ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3
and sysutils/eject, which contain security
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Joseph Marah wrote:
Does anyone know if this is available for FreeBSD as a port? Thanks.
I have just received a message on the ports list that xorg 7.2 has been
merged into the ports tree:
As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the
past few
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
branching), while allowing continued development in the ports tree?
There will be very few truly major projects of this
Doug Barton wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in
this case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree
(possibly CVS branching), while allowing continued development in the
ports tree?
There will be very few truly major
On 2007-May-19 21:49:28 +0100, Florent Thoumie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As you may already know, the X11 team has been working hard for the past
few months to upgrade X.org ports to 7.2. After a couple of weeks of
testing, we've finally committed this upgrade. We also decided to make
the PREFIX
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by fix you mean remove X11R6 related stuff. My vote
(as someone deeply interested in /etc and especially rc.d
On 2007-May-19 14:46:56 -0700, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
branching), while allowing
Garrett Cooper wrote:
(sorry for cross-posting, but this is relevant to ports@ too)
Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. I need to try cvsup
as well to see if the modifications outstanding with the cvsup
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Maybe it would have been useful to have a 'pre 7.2 import' tag
That was actually done. It would definitely be useful for you to check
the CVS repository before guessing about stuff like this. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
On 2007-May-19 15:28:03 -0700, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Maybe it would have been useful to have a 'pre 7.2 import' tag
That was actually done. It would definitely be useful for you to check the
CVS repository before guessing about stuff like this. :)
My
On Sun, May 20, 2007 at 02:04:51AM +0400, Sergey Kovalev wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
(sorry for cross-posting, but this is relevant to ports@ too)
Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap. I need to try cvsup
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:10:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by fix you mean remove X11R6 related stuff. My vote
Dear colleagues,
I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
experimental tree.
However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
(last few lines from script log):
=== portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 01:51:02PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Wouldn't it be sufficient to force major component testers (in this
case Xorg 7.2) to use periodic snapshots of the ports tree (possibly CVS
branching), while allowing continued development in the ports tree?
In this particular
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
DM Dear colleagues,
DM
DM I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
DM experimental tree.
DM
DM However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange
erro
DM (last few lines from script log):
DM
DM
Dmitry Morozovsky píše v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 02:50 +0400:
However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
(last few lines from script log):
=== portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/ruby18 - found
=== portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file:
On 5/19/07, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
The gist of the email is asking the age old question, are we there
yet?
As many have commented there are a number of issues with a variety of
ports which need to be addressed. Some I've noticed are net/samba3 and
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-19 15:10:07 -0700, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by fix you mean remove X11R6
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2007 at 03:10:07PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I presume there will be followup commits at some stage to fix
src/etc/defaults/rc.conf src/etc/defaults/periodic.conf and
src/etc/login.conf
I presume that by fix you mean remove X11R6
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Giancarlo Rubio wrote:
--
Giancarlo Rubio
Linux is for people who hate Windows,
BSD is for people who love UNIX
Freebsd-BR User #88
i believe i fall into the latter.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Laganakos Vassilis wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
prevented the upgrade of the rest ports. The faulted ones are:
x11-toolkits/tix
x11-toolkits/qt4-gui
devel/sdl12
graphics/gimp
Garrett Cooper wrote:
Please be aware that the portsnap snapshot hasn't been updated yet to
include the X.org 7.2 addition, if you use portsnap.
Right now, portsnap is distributing half of Xorg 7.2. This isn't portsnap's
fault; the portsnap buildbox CVSuped from cvsup-master in the middle of
Hello Alex Dupre.
Thanks for your good job as maintainer for the php5 port. I was
wondering when PHP 5.2.2 will be available for install via the ports
collection.
Best regards,
Andreas Gehrke
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
PL Dmitry Morozovsky p??e v ne 20. 05. 2007 v 02:50 +0400:
PL
PL However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange
erro
PL (last few lines from script log):
PL
PL === portupgrade-2.2.6_3,2 depends on file:
Michel Talon wrote:
Not completely because some programs install shared libraries in very
non standard places, notably perl installs perl.so like this:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/libperl.so
or mozilla installs mozilla libs in another strange place. And there are
other ports which make
On Sun, 20 May 2007 02:50:09 +0400 (MSD)
Dmitry Morozovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear colleagues,
I'd successfully upgraded my notebook approx a week ago using tarred
experimental tree.
However, just after The Big Commit [tm] ;) I'd falled into very strange erro
(last few lines from
Peter Jeremy wrote:
If you upgrade to xorg 7.2 but don't cleanup the /etc files then rc.d
and periodic scripts are processe twice.
Here is a lightly tested patch to rc.subr that should do the trick. If
someone wants to give this a ride on a system where this issue has
been a problem, I
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Wed, 16 May 2007 18:14:01
-0400):
On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:01 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Ok chaps, I think I have it.
This involves no recursive calls of make. Furthermore the
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
My lord.. now I see what everyone means in terms of taking a long
time to update the ports / package databases. If you use portsnap, it doesn't
take a long time. However, if you use csup/cvsup, it appears to take a long
time running make and ruby
On 2007-May-19 16:21:49 -0700, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. Before deinstall, save shared libs in /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg
2. After install, remove anything from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg with the
same name as something installed by the new port.
One possible gotcha with blindly
[Picking a random posting]
For the past 4 days, you have been making a variety of doing X broke
Y comments in a variety of threads without ever providing sufficient
information to allow someone else to make a sensible response. The
posting I am replying to is no different.
On 2007-May-19
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that posting?
last thing i tried was:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
My lord.. now I see what everyone means in terms of taking a long
time to update the ports / package databases. If you use portsnap, it
doesn't take a long time. However, if you use csup/cvsup, it appears
to
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that posting?
last thing
On Sat, 19 May 2007, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
The closest I can find to any details on this is your posting of
17 May 2007 12:05:07 -0700 where you post an extract of gtk20
failing to configure. Did you follow the instructions that you
copied into that
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Don't try. portupgrade is maintained by someone else, and the scripts are a
mess.
If someone could have improved the scripts, they would have tried a while
ago..
oh
On Sat, 19 May 2007, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
i am sorry for having a low comfort level. i want to improve.
guessing where x11-toolkit/gtk20 is (even though the location hasn't
BSD.local.dist still isn't
well..i have an X i guess. don't know how to add a new terminal here.
here is some nice error messages
Unmatched .
firefox
(Gecko:3325): Pango-WARNING **: No builtin or dynamically loaded modules
were found. Pango will not work correctly. This probably means
there was an error in the
On May 19, 2007, at 9:30 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Garrett Cooper wrote:
gtk20 is causing me fits, but that's just the symptom. The cause
is that the pkg database(s) are fubared
Let me add that on my system with WITHOUT_X11 also has a foobarred
pkg database. It seems to improve a bit
On my system, the program pkg_version can double its speed simply by
replacing make -V PKGNAME by make BEFOREPORTMK=yes -V PKGNAME in
src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/version. Basically what it does is to tell
make to process only about half of bsd.port.mk.
It seems to me that with some clever use
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-May-19 16:21:49 -0700, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still feel that the only safe way to do this is to find the union of
'ldconfig -r' and 'pkg_info -L' and save those files, and those files only.
That should be intersection, not union.
Yeah, that's
53 matches
Mail list logo
