Hi,
I've tested current beryl (fresh portsnap from yesterday) on -CURRENT
and found it working (using NVidia 7600 GS, it idles at 98%, even while
windows are wobbling while being moved around with KDE+Beryl), except
when I switch from KWin to Beryl, I lose window decorations (titlebar,
borders, re
Hi!
I have tried to install xorg on "clean" (no packages installed) FreeBSD
7.0-CURRENT AMD64. I have errors:
in
/usr/ports/x11/libXres
Package resourceproto was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `resourceproto.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH
Rather easy nspluginwrapper + Flash9 plugin in Firefox on Current and 6.2
stable. It's to some *extent* usable, but will segfault (only nspluginwrapper)
while playing videos.
Cheers, Oliver
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 08:15:31PM +0200, Willy Picard wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:46:30PM +0100, R
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:46:30PM +0100, RW wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500
> "Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the ports
> > > tree even if it does
Jeremy Chadwick píše v po 08. 10. 2007 v 01:47 -0700:
> Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
> editors/vim gets worse and worse as more patches are released:
>
> icarus# cd /usr/ports/editors/vim-lite && make distclean
> icarus# time make fetch
> ...
> 10.801u 3.297s 6:16
Quoting John Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 8 Oct 2007 08:10:11 -0700):
>
> [ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ]
> > The port is not broken as the flash9 port is not compiled, it just
> > installs the linux flash9 binary. What is broken is the linux
> > emulation on FreeBSD < 7. Work
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 01:47:57 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a subject I've wanted to bring up for a few years now. Why I
> decided to bring it up now, I don't know; I guess I just felt it was
> time.
>
> Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
> e
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:52:18 -0500
"Scot Hetzel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The thing that shocked me is the fact that the port is still in the
> > ports tree
> > even if it does not work! (It compiles but each try to view a Flash
> > anima
On Monday 08 October 2007 05:46:13 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:05:46AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:2
[ On Monday, October 8, Scot Hetzel wrote: ]
> The port is not broken as the flash9 port is not compiled, it just
> installs the linux flash9 binary. What is broken is the linux
> emulation on FreeBSD < 7. Work is underway to improve the linux
> emulation in -CURRENT.
>
> I agree the port should
On 10/8/07, Willy Picard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I write this email to give my humble opinion on the scandalous status of the
> linux-flashplugin9. This port is in the port tree for now 8 monthes (first
> commit on the 17th of January 2007) and one should admit that it never
> worked.
Hi,
I write this email to give my humble opinion on the scandalous status of the
linux-flashplugin9. This port is in the port tree for now 8 monthes (first
commit on the 17th of January 2007) and one should admit that it never worked. A
numerous set of mails has already been sent on this mailing l
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 05:05:46AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> > > > # Portupgrade -a
> > > > Erro
On Saturday 06 October 2007 05:18:10 Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 06, 2007 at 12:25:36AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > On Wednesday 03 October 2007 09:27:34 David Southwell wrote:
> > > # Portupgrade -a
> > > Error message:
> > >
> > > ** Port marked as IGNORE: x11-toolkits/py-wxPython24
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
This is a subject I've wanted to bring up for a few years now. Why I
decided to bring it up now, I don't know; I guess I just felt it was
time.
Simply put: the time it takes for "make fetch" to complete in
editors/vim gets worse and worse as more patches are released:
icarus# cd /usr/ports/edito
Andrea Venturoli ha scritto:
"portupgrade -o lang/php5 php4" ?
It's not enough, and may cause problems.
Or:
pkg_deinstall -f php4\*
pkgdb -F
?
That's better. Remove all (php4, extensions, pecl ports, optimizers),
build php5 with all the same extensions and finally run pkgdb if you
have ot
Hello.
Due to the recent vulnerabilities, the fact that a patch hasn't come out
for a while, and knowing that it's almost EOL, I'm preparing to move my
servers from php4 to php5, starting with the least critical ones.
Is there a reccomended procedure?
Something like:
"portupgrade -o lang/php5 p
18 matches
Mail list logo
