rmdir: (...) Directory not empty

2008-04-24 Thread Petar Bogdanovic
Hi, I just started using ports, did a `make package-recursive' on shells/bash and got this: (...) ===> Compressing manual pages for bash-3.2.33 ===> Registering installation for bash-3.2.33 ===> Building package for bash-3.2.33 Creating package /var/tm

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:02:51AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > > > >> Because my check-updated-modules script was reta

FreeBSD Port: pound-2.4.1

2008-04-24 Thread Brandon Gabert
Hello, I've been using pound for quite a while, first thank you for maintaining this port. After portupgrading to the latest version, it seems to be sending a 302 to all requests I expect it to proxy https://mail.guardianchem.ca/owa to my BE server at http://10.0.0.2/owa, in IE I just get a Int

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: > >> It may be overkill but in the past I have run ports-mgmt/portscout to >> check for updated versions of ports. I have not run it looking for perl > > That does seem overkill!

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread hideo
Vivek Khera (Thu 04/24/08 10:33): > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > >> Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand >> that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be > > Is this script something you can share? I mai

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 24, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Wesley Shields wrote: It may be overkill but in the past I have run ports-mgmt/portscout to check for updated versions of ports. I have not run it looking for perl That does seem overkill! Thanks for the pointer. _

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Wesley Shields
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 10:33:27AM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: > >> Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand >> that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be > > Is this script some

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Vivek Khera
On Apr 24, 2008, at 4:53 AM, Lars Balker Rasmussen wrote: Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be Is this script something you can share? I maintain about 10 perl modules for ports and i

Re: purely package-based/oriented solution

2008-04-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 24/04/2008 12:14 Andy Kosela said the following: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following: >> > Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ. >> > >> > Is there a tool for purely package-based management o

Re: ejabberd 2.0.0 ?

2008-04-24 Thread Bogdan Ćulibrk
Shaun Amott wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:36:26PM +0100, Olivier Mueller wrote: Hello, Are there any plans to update the port with the latest ejabberd (2.0.0) version? Latest release was about 1 month ago: http://www.process-one.net/en/news/article/ejabberd_200_has_been_released/ Otherw

Re: purely package-based/oriented solution

2008-04-24 Thread Andy Kosela
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:11 AM, Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ. > > > > Is there a tool for purely package-based management of third-party > software? > > That is, something that me

Re: FreeBSD Port: p5-libwww-5.805

2008-04-24 Thread Lars Balker Rasmussen
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:57:14AM +0800, Ching Hsien Ho wrote: > Why don't you update this port for long time? Because my check-updated-modules script was retarded and didn't understand that p5-libwww is called libwww-perl on cpan. Fixing, and will be updating asap. -- Lars Balker Rasmussen

Re: Upgrading 'lsof-4.79K' to 'lsof-4.79,1' failed

2008-04-24 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
do I just need to update my sources and build a kernel or do I need to buildworld? I hope it is just a build kernel because I get stuck on merge master after build world, I don't understand the questions it asks Thank you for your help Sam Fourman Jr. ___

Re: purely package-based/oriented solution

2008-04-24 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Andriy Gapon píše v čt 24. 04. 2008 v 09:43 +0300: > on 23/04/2008 17:03 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > but I still want to keep ports for things that I'd rather customize myself. > > But for the sake of experiment I will try mv-ing ports of the way and > > see what happens. > > For the reco

Re: purely package-based/oriented solution

2008-04-24 Thread Alexander Leidinger
Quoting Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Thu, 24 Apr 2008 09:46:38 +0300): on 24/04/2008 09:02 Alexander Leidinger said the following: Quoting Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 23 Apr 2008 15:39:17 +0200): Andriy Gapon píše v st 23. 04. 2008 v 16:35 +0300: BTW, strange thi

Re: purely package-based/oriented solution

2008-04-24 Thread Andriy Gapon
on 22/04/2008 22:41 Andriy Gapon said the following: > Sorry if this is something obvious or a FAQ. > > Is there a tool for purely package-based management of third-party software? > That is, something that meets the following criteria: > 1. doesn't require ports tree > 2. works similarly to packa