Hello,
I take advantage of this discussion to refer to my own port submission
(ports/123614)
open from 12 may, a short delay of course, but I will be very happy to see it
aproved ;)
Thanks
Rodrigo
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Sahil Tandon wrote:
Wesley Shields [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 12:56:48AM +0200, Nikolaj Thygesen wrote:
Hi,
I hope this is the right list to ask this question. I recently
commited a new port, and received two messages from ports. The first
one noted that a
Kris Kennaway píše v pá 06. 06. 2008 v 13:39 +0200:
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: INDEX build failed for 6.x
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:03:22 GMT
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Kris Kennaway píše v pá 06. 06. 2008 v 13:39 +0200:
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: INDEX build failed for 6.x
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:03:22 GMT
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please
wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/chinese/links/../../www/links/Makefile, line 75:
warning: duplicate script for target pre-configure ignored
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index:
I don't really understand why it's there and why it's recommending to rebuild
all ports.
I have 761 ports installed, but only 173 of them depend on gettext, so why
should
I reinstall more than 530 ports that don't need to be rebuild.
What's even worse according to my shell-script pkg_libchk
Dominic Fandrey writes:
I don't really understand why it's there and why it's
recommending to rebuild all ports.
Neither do I. Either the entry is poorly worded (all existing
install ports should be all installed ports that depend on
gettext) or the logic needs to be made plain.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I don't really understand why it's there and why it's recommending to
rebuild
all ports.
I have 761 ports installed, but only 173 of them depend on gettext, so
why should
I reinstall more than 530 ports that don't need to be rebuild.
What's even worse according to my
FYI, the logs referenced in QA Tindy emails sent out so far are now
here:
http://t64.tecnik93.com/errors/7-STABLE-FTP.pre-gettext/
I had to rm the packages and tbcleanup after the gettext update.
--
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD user
Intellectual Property is nowhere near as valuable
I am the maintainer for the image processing package known as
GraphicsMagick. A few weeks ago, the FreeBSD port maintainer for
GraphicsMagick became upset and quit. This leaves me a bit concerned
since my project is left in limbo.
As of yesterday, the current GraphicsMagick releases are
On Fri, Jun 06, 2008 at 06:38:51PM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
I don't really understand why it's there and why it's recommending to
rebuild
all ports.
I have 761 ports installed, but only 173 of them depend on gettext, so
why should
I reinstall more than
Erik Trulsson wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Ldd says it's not necessary. Can anyone really argue with that?
How can ldd determine that it is not necessary?
libintl got version bumped, so if something linked against it, ldd
would be looking for the old version, not find it and complain
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:52 AM, eculp wrote:
...
FreeBSD doesn't release copies of diablo-jdk / -jre except with real
release versions of FreeBSD (8-CURRENT isn't a release version because
it's directly based off of HEAD).
As for the other error, you'll need another copy of Java to
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:52 -0500, eculp wrote:
I've not been able to get OpenOffice to compile on my AMD64-2 Current8
because first it will not accept diablo-jdk15 and neither jdk15 or
jdk16 finish compiling.
# uname -a
FreeBSD ed.local.net.mx 8.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT #114: Mon
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 14:45 -0400, Robert Noland wrote:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:52 -0500, eculp wrote:
I've not been able to get OpenOffice to compile on my AMD64-2 Current8
because first it will not accept diablo-jdk15 and neither jdk15 or
jdk16 finish compiling.
# uname -a
I updated today ports tree and several installed packages get newer than
ports:
avahi-app-0.6.22_4succeeds port (port has 0.6.22_1)
linc-1.0.3_6 succeeds port (port has 1.0.3_1)
ru-openoffice.org-2.4.0_4 succeeds port (port has 2.4.0_1)
seems for some ports the
Quoting Robert Noland [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:52 -0500, eculp wrote:
I've not been able to get OpenOffice to compile on my AMD64-2 Current8
because first it will not accept diablo-jdk15 and neither jdk15 or
jdk16 finish compiling.
# uname -a
FreeBSD ed.local.net.mx
Quoting Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Jun 6, 2008, at 10:52 AM, eculp wrote:
...
FreeBSD doesn't release copies of diablo-jdk / -jre except with
real release versions of FreeBSD (8-CURRENT isn't a release version
because it's directly based off of HEAD).
As for the other error,
Hello Max,
On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 12:18:14AM +0400, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
I updated today ports tree and several installed packages get newer than
ports:
avahi-app-0.6.22_4succeeds port (port has 0.6.22_1)
linc-1.0.3_6 succeeds port (port has 1.0.3_1)
This port hasn't been updated in a long time and Propel is now at 1.3.
Any plans to update the port or should I just install a later version
manually?
Thanks,
Alan Bryan
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Friesenhahn
I am the maintainer for the image processing package known as
GraphicsMagick. A few weeks ago, the FreeBSD port maintainer
for GraphicsMagick became upset and quit. This leaves me
I'm getting a
--
|--- gettext-runtime/intl-java/Makefile.in.orig Mon May 23 04:23:40 2005
|+++ gettext-runtime/intl-java/Makefile.in Tue Jan 30 20:02:41 2007
--
Patching file gettext-runtime/intl-java/Makefile.in using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed
23 matches
Mail list logo
