Re: Source install to look like installed package

2008-09-17 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 04:40:59PM -0400, Francisco Reyes wrote: > Matthew Seaman writes: > > > You mean you want to generate a /var/db/pkg/portname-1.2.3 > > directory with appropriate contents so you can wrangle a bunch > > of files already on your hard drive as if they were a port? > > Yes. >

ftp/py-curl - fails: mtree

2008-09-17 Thread QAT
Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_

clamav port for 0.94 version , pls help

2008-09-17 Thread Snopy Land
Hi, My server version is freebsd6.2 amd64. I have installed clamav to scan my incoming mail. Everything works smoothly for several years. Recently, I need to upgrade clamav version from 0.92 to 0.94 (latest version). Actually, I had done this upgrade clamav process before. My procedures is : 1. r

Re: STILL OPEN: Fwd: ports/127015: [patch] Impossible to fetch devel/valgrind from the jail

2008-09-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 03:38:28AM +0400, Alexander Churanov wrote: > In the beginning of September, I've filed an issue about > devel/valgrind and also sent an e-mail to port maintainer. The issue > is still unresolved. For future reference, the address to contact with issues with maintainers is

textproc/xslide.el - fails: mtree

2008-09-17 Thread QAT
Hi, The build which triggered this email is done under tinderbox-2.4.3, on 7-STABLE on amd64, with tinderd_flags="-nullfs -plistcheck -onceonly" and ccache support, with the "official" up-to-date Ports Tree, with the following vars set: NOPORTDOCS=yes, NOPORTEXAMPLES=yes, NOPORTDATA=yes, FORCE_

Re: port: security/cfs

2008-09-17 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem, > is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or > later. ports/127457 Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis |Personal

Re: port: security/cfs

2008-09-17 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 06:38:56PM -0400, Christopher Sean Hilton wrote: > The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem, > is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or > later. I got patches which I (stupidely) never commited. I'll send0pr them

STILL OPEN: Fwd: ports/127015: [patch] Impossible to fetch devel/valgrind from the jail

2008-09-17 Thread Alexander Churanov
Wesley, In the beginning of September, I've filed an issue about devel/valgrind and also sent an e-mail to port maintainer. The issue is still unresolved. I've also noted that the same person is responsible for devel/boost, that is of version 1.34 in ports while current version is 1.36. The versi

port: security/cfs

2008-09-17 Thread Christopher Sean Hilton
The port security/cfs, Matt Blaze's userland Cryptographic filesystem, is marked as broken because it does not compile under FreeBSD-7.0 or later. I've managed to get it to compile through some simple changes but I don't know enough about RPC to know if I am on the right track. I'm asking

Re: axis2/c & port

2008-09-17 Thread Pietro Cerutti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Franco Marchesini wrote: | Hello guys, Hello, | there is someone that already working on axis2/c ports? Yes me, I have a draft ready and am waiting for the ports tree to un-freeze before committing it. I will send it to you tomorrow for review, if

Re: Source install to look like installed package

2008-09-17 Thread Francisco Reyes
Matthew Seaman writes: You mean you want to generate a /var/db/pkg/portname-1.2.3 directory with appropriate contents so you can wrangle a bunch of files already on your hard drive as if they were a port? Yes. Actually, that's pretty much what the ports system does when you do an install fro

Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore

2008-09-17 Thread Doug Barton
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > I also don't think that we can simply tell our users to user portmaster > or some force-config switches. If you read my post carefully I was suggesting that using portmaster would be a temporary workaround while the actual problem is (hopefully) being fixed. Doug --

Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore

2008-09-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 03:44:14 am Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:31AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > >Nevertheless, going back to rev. 1.559 of b.p.m. restores correct > > >behavior. > > > > Are you sure? I didn't try, but that commit see

Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore

2008-09-17 Thread John Baldwin
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 02:41:07 am Alex Dupre wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > John was referring to the problem of 'make config' not being called for > > ports being installed as dependencies of a port that has OPTIONS. > > John said (correct me if I'm wrong) that with an up-to-date system

Re: Evince 2.22.2_3: "Unhandled MIME type: “applic ation/pdf”"

2008-09-17 Thread Mark Evenson
Jeremy Messenger wrote: [...] Have you guys follow in /usr/ports/UPDATING? Mezz is refering to the entry labeled 20080725: 20080725: AFFECTS: users of x11-fm/nautilus and misc/shared-mime-info AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In order to properly update x11-fm/nautilus and misc/shared-mime-i

Re: Evince 2.22.2_3: "Unhandled MIME type: “application/pdf”""

2008-09-17 Thread Jeremy Messenger
On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 07:56:55 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:57:03 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan Reinholz wrote: Since updating to the latest revision of Evince (to 2.22.2_3 from 2.22.2_2) I am no longer a

Re: Evince 2.22.2_3: "Unhandled MIME type: “applic ation/pdf”"

2008-09-17 Thread sergio lenzi
Em Qua, 2008-09-17 às 14:56 +0200, Mark Evenson escreveu: > Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:57:03 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> Dan Reinholz wrote: > >>> Since updating to the latest revision of Evince (to > >>> 2.22.2_3 from 2.22.2_2) I am no lon

Re: Evince 2.22.2_3: "Unhandled MIME type: “applic ation/pdf”"

2008-09-17 Thread Mark Evenson
Jeremy Messenger wrote: On Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:57:03 -0500, Mark Evenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Dan Reinholz wrote: Since updating to the latest revision of Evince (to 2.22.2_3 from 2.22.2_2) I am no longer able to open .pdf files. Anytime I try to do so I now get the error: [...] Hav

axis2/c & port

2008-09-17 Thread Franco Marchesini
Hello guys, there is someone that already working on axis2/c ports? Ciao Franco ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: OPTIONS handling doesn't seem to work fully in dependencies anymore

2008-09-17 Thread Alexey Dokuchaev
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 08:52:31AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote: > Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >Nevertheless, going back to rev. 1.559 of b.p.m. restores correct > >behavior. > > Are you sure? I didn't try, but that commit seems to add new reasons to > show up the dialog box while not removing any of th