INDEX build failed for 6.x

INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk, line 634: The Pre include part of bsd.gnome.mk part is not included. Did you forget WANT_GNOME=yes before bsd.port.pre.mk? === palm/synce-vdccm failed *** Error code 1 pkg_info: not found

Re: LATEST_LINK not in index

Dominic Fandrey píše v st 01. 04. 2009 v 00:12 +0200: Upgrades are easy. Look up @comment ORIGIN line in +CONTENTS file of the port being upgraded, then look up this value in second column of INDEX file. I don't see how this is connected to my question. I want people to be able to

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

This weeks HOT jobs and TIPS to finding new employment!

Your email client cannot read this email. To view it online, please go here: http://www.globalfmjobs.co.uk/sendstudionx/display.php?M=130904C=dbd523afe161828c7501944a6821b2a7S=77L=12N=33 To stop receiving these

Re: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:42:47 +0200, Dirk Meyer wrote: It will be useful to add RSS/Atom feeds to some pages on pointyhat.freebsd.org Insted of periodicaly polling of pointyhat, this feed can be added in rss-reader. DM DM This would be a lot of data for an RSS feed. DM Could you elaborate

Re: Status of devel/boost upgrade

* Jeremy Messenger (me...@cox.net) wrote: No need bsd.boost.mk over that small stuff. How about resolve conflict for real by split boost and boost-python by have boost only install non-python stuff and boost-python install only python stuff? That of course would be harder and more

Re: why was XFree86 dropped for ports?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robert Noland wrote: On Tue, 2009-03-31 at 22:36 -0400, Chuck Robey wrote: I recently got kde4.2 working on my home box, and all the neat eye candy things that are added, I'll have to see, maybe you're right, XFree86 might not work with KDE,

Chandler port .. ?

Hallo list, I've been wondering if someone here is a user of Chandler (The Note-to-Self Organizer) which is quite a great and useful application: http://chandlerproject.org/ It is a multi platform, written in Python with a few dependencies. It is available for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux

Re: Chandler port .. ?

On Wed, Apr 01, 2009 at 11:02:56PM +0200, martinko wrote: Therefore I wonder if and wish that someone skilled would try and port Chandler to FreeBSD. :-) +1 Willy -- Willy Picarde-mail: willy.pic...@ue.poznan.pl Dept. of Information Technology www:

Re: Chandler port .. ?

martinko wrote: Hallo list, I've been wondering if someone here is a user of Chandler (The Note-to-Self Organizer) which is quite a great and useful application: http://chandlerproject.org/ It is a multi platform, written in Python with a few dependencies. It is available for Windows, Mac OS

How to name a port for MPC (the C library)

I need to package MPC (http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/) which is going to become a prerequisite of GCC 4.5. In principle that should be simple, except that we already have ports/audio/mpc which is something quite different. Any thoughts on how to best handle this? Gerald @FreeBSD.org PS:

-pthread propagation

Hi! I have a question about -pthread. Imagine the situation where one port installs shared library that uses threads, and other port links with this library. A question: should the second port explicitely add -pthread to linker flags? For example, graphics/ilmbase is built with pthread support

Re: -pthread propagation

On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: Hi! I have a question about -pthread. Imagine the situation where one port installs shared library that uses threads, and other port links with this library. A question: should the second port explicitely add -pthread to linker flags? Yes. For

Re: How to name a port for MPC (the C library)

On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com wrote: I need to package MPC (http://www.multiprecision.org/mpc/) which is going to become a prerequisite of GCC 4.5. In principle that should be simple, except that we already have ports/audio/mpc which is something quite

Re: HEADS UP multi processor compilations for everyone

On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:57:51 -0400 Coleman Kane cok...@freebsd.org wrote: On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 19:30 +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: This would break very fast -- it's passing -j3 to port Makefile instead of vendor Makefile.