INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make
Is there anyone out there with experience porting from Linux to
FreeBSD and/or writing code for both who can spare a few cycles to
help a complete novice figure out what's different (and how to fix
it)?
Respectfully,
Robert Huff
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make
* M. Warner Losh (i...@bsdimp.com) wrote:
> I don't think that GPLv2 section 3c applies because we've not received
> an section 3b offer to redistribute. Instead, the RPMs are provided
> under section 3a. The FSF made a big deal about this not being
> sufficient a while ago.
Oh, after reading i
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Done.
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make_index: epplets-0.12: no entry for /usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment
make
On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:06:56 +0400
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 barbara wrote:
>
> > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver
> > > and other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
> > >
> > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driv
Hi,
The latest bump to math/fftw3 from 3.2 to 3.2.1 missed the distinfo
changes, which still references fftw-3.2.tar.gz.
Cheers.
--
Jonathan Chen
--
When you don't know what you are doing, do it neatly.
___
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:27:16 +0300
Eugen-Andrei Gavriloaie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to bring to your attention my project hosted here:
>
> http://www.rtmpd.com
>
> I know how Adobe is keep ignoring our request of having a flash
> player for FreeBSD. I though that at least we have another d
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 barbara wrote:
> > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
> > other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
> >
> > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
> > libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good
Hi,
I would like to bring to your attention my project hosted here:
http://www.rtmpd.com
I know how Adobe is keep ignoring our request of having a flash player
for FreeBSD. I though that at least we have another decent C++
implementation of a media server. This is an "under development"
p
> Hi!
>
>
> I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
> other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
>
> If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
> libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right to
> mark this port and other linux dr
Eitan Adler wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
if gcc -DBSD=1 -DSMALL -DSHELL -DGLOB_BROKEN -DFNMATCH_BROKEN
-DIFS_BROKEN -D__COPYRIGHT\(x\)= -D__RCSID\(x\)= -D_DIAGASSERT\(x\)= -I.
-I. -I.. -include ../config.h -g -O2 -Wall -MT exec.o -MD -MP -MF
".deps/exec.Tpo" \
My system: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #0: Fri May 1 08:49:13 UTC 2009
r...@walker.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
Skype-out calls disconnect after about 5 minutes. I red that was problem with
beta or pre release but looks like that is the problem here still. Version of
Skype is
===>Verifying install for panel-applet-2.0 in /usr/ports/x11/gnome-panel
===> gnome-panel-2.26.2 depends on executable: gmake - found
[many depends deleted]
===> gnome-panel-2.26.2 depends on shared library: pango-1.0.0 - found
===> Configuring for gnome-panel-2.26.2
cp: configure: No su
David Naylor wrote:
On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200
David Naylor wrote:
P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile
under tmpfs?
Me.
The following are on my blacklist for tmpfs build, where:
Hello Martin!
Wed, May 27, 2009 at 03:43:43PM +0200 you wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> First of all sorry for all unanswered mails, I got a stupid flu,
> but now i feel better... ok now back to vbox, time for a new call
> for testing :-)
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_5.tgz
I'm ru
On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 14:28:58 +0400
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
> I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
> other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
>
> If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
> libGL.so with a link to nvidia librar
On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 11:34:12 + Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
> > other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
> >
> > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
> > libGL.so with a
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> Hi!
Hello there,
>
> I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
> other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
>
> If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
> libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right
Sound a bit stupid to retire it in favor of options such as Xen or VirtualBox.
Kqemu is non-obtrusive, tested, and easily ported between systems. For some of
us, good hardware or new hardware is not an option.
> From: n...@jelal.kn-bremen.de
> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 20:59:32 +0200
> To: freebsd
Hi!
I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver and
other linux dri ports to be in conflict.
If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to replace
libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it right to
mark this port and other linux dri ports to be i
Hi,
Ever since I upgraded to ruby-1.8.7.160 on two separate hosts this
past week, portupgrade has been complaining with:
** Database file locked. Waiting.
or ** Stale lock removed.
even if there is only one portupgrade process that's running. If I
revert back to ruby-1.8.7.72, these w
On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
> On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200
>
> David Naylor wrote:
> > P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile
> > under tmpfs?
>
> Me.
The following are on my blacklist for tmpfs build, where:
# df -h | grep tmp
tmpfs
23 matches
Mail list logo
