As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users of ports
that are marked as broken in their Makefiles. In many cases
these ports are failing to compile on some subset of the FreeBSD
build environments. The most common
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or
the cessation of development on
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the
FreeBSD ports system, we periodically notify users about
ports that are marked as forbidden in their Makefiles. Often,
these ports are so marked due to security concerns, such as known
exploits.
An overview of each port,
Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Something like the following.
[/usr/local/bin/]
libstdc++.so/usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so
libstdc++.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so.6
That looks quite nice, and I was going to use that, alas
Philip M. Gollucci píše v po 21. 09. 2009 v 01:15 -0400:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
yes, we (portmgr) noticed this too. But we don't know why it happens,
yet.
I'm 99% sure its because lang/perl5.10 is built after lang/perl5.8 and
the latter sets NO_LATEST_LINK=yes.
If that's
On 21 Sep 2009 07:30, lini...@freebsd.org wrote:
As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in
the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports
that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often,
this is due to a better alternative
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:15:22AM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
yes, we (portmgr) noticed this too. But we don't know why it happens,
yet.
I'm 99% sure its because lang/perl5.10 is built after lang/perl5.8 and
the latter sets NO_LATEST_LINK=yes.
(Note: an HTML version of this report is available at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr-summary.cgi?category=ports .)
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and
Anybody tried porting cinelerra?
--
Andriy Gapon
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
In article alpine.lsu.1.99.0909202328340.5...@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at,
Gerald Pfeiferger...@pfeifer.com writes:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Jason J. Hellenthal wrote:
Something like the following.
[/usr/local/bin/]
libstdc++.so/usr/local/lib/gcc44/libstdc++.so
libstdc++.so.6
Erwin Lansing wrote:
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 01:15:22AM -0400, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
yes, we (portmgr) noticed this too. But we don't know why it happens,
yet.
I'm 99% sure its because lang/perl5.10 is built after lang/perl5.8 and
the latter sets
Philip M. Gollucci píše v po 21. 09. 2009 v 16:19 -0400:
Well that might be the 'current' case, but lang/perl5.10's latest link
has not been present for 6+ months.
Because the port declares NO_LATEST_LINK in it's Makefile!
--
Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz
p...@freebsd.org
I want
Hi
What happen with postfix port and VDA (Virtual Delivery Agent 32Bit) support?
Can work on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 system?
postfix 2.6.5,1 was built with this option and don't work.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 05:56:06PM -0400, Jorge Medina wrote:
Hi
What happen with postfix port and VDA (Virtual Delivery Agent 32Bit) support?
Can work on FreeBSD 7.2 amd64 system?
postfix 2.6.5,1 was built with this option and don't work.
I just committed an updated VDA patch on
OK, I've given it over to you and extended its life another few weeks.
Good luck :-)
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
17 matches
Mail list logo