OpenArena (maintainer timeout)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146818
wacom (approved patch by Alex Deiter)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146495
Should there be any reasons why this hasn't been committed yet,
I'd like to be told.
portlint makes a huge fuss abo
Hi,
Ever since the addition of graphics/libjpeg-turbo, I had
been wondering how one could possibly build the whole ports tree
with it instead of graphics/jpeg. I wanted the choice.
Therefore, I wrote the attached bsd.jpeg.mk as a suggestion.
With it, we just add
USE_JPEG
Hi,
There is a conflict between graphics/gd and devel/bazaar, cf.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=147418
Would it be acceptable to rename the bzr's annotate command into a
bzr-annotate command, as gd is older than bzr?
--
Sébastien Santoro aka Dereckson
__
Currently the databases/php5-odbc PHP extension is hardcoded to be compiled
with unixODBC backend, so the users that have libiodbc installed (as a
dependency of kde4 ports, for ex.) can't installed the first 'cause those two
ODBC ports conflict with each other.
The php-odbc configure script
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 02:46:27AM +0200, Marco Br??der wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I know the ports license framework is very new and not mature yet.
>
> But it is not very useful in its current state, because several
> popular licenses are missing and some license foo is not right /
> specific enough t
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
>> On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
>>> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
>>> BSD licences should be separated.
>>
>> Yes, they really are d
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Marco Bröder wrote:
> On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
>> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
>> BSD licences should be separated.
>
> Yes, they really are different licenses.
The BSD license has evolved over time. Comp
On Tue June 15 2010 09:10:49 Janne Snabb wrote:
> As a previous poster pointed out, I also think that the different
> BSD licences should be separated.
Yes, they really are different licenses.
Who else should it know better than the FreeBSD Project (and NetBSD, OpenBSD,
DragonflyBSD, ...)? ;-)
On Tue June 15 2010 04:03:08 Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> On 06/15/10 00:46, Marco Bröder wrote:
> > I find it especially important to have a expression for 'version X or any
> > later version' (for example 'LGPLv2+'), since the following dummy example
> > is
>
> > not adequate:
> A very good idea,
Evidently the Port: hplip-3.10.5_1 does not have a full time
maintainer. In any case, I have noticed this notation in the system log
when starting KDE:
Jun 15 10:24:37 scorpio python: hp-systray[3768]: error: option -s not
recognized
There does not appear to be any apparent problem though. Is th
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Jesse Smith wrote:
...
> I'm trying to port a program which is distributed in two separate
> packages from the upstream project. One package contains the executable
> program and the other contains data files. The Data package rarely
> changes. The idea being packa
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 08:21 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 15/06/2010 07:46:27, Eric wrote:
> > It would seem from reading the various posting that the two missing features
> > are some sort of clean way of saying "this license or higher" and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 15/06/2010 07:46:27, Eric wrote:
> It would seem from reading the various posting that the two missing features
> are some sort of clean way of saying "this license or higher" and possibly
> something along the lines of "like this licence" for cases
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Where I live, someone without a legal degree cannot offer legal
advice
[..]
It might also not be a bad idea to not display anything about
licensing until a human enables some Makefile switch which acknowledges
the limitations of the system (ie, license
14 matches
Mail list logo
