Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:58 PM, b. f. wrote: > On 9/1/10, Scot Hetzel wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. wrote: >>> On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: > >>So according to bsd.own.mk, this is the correct test for the math/blas >>port to determine if profiling libraries should be built: >>

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 09/01/2010 01:41, b. f. wrote: > On 9/1/10, jhell wrote: >> On 09/01/2010 01:14, jhell wrote: >>> On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote: No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed, unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk. >>> >>> ports(7) pulls in src

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
On 9/1/10, jhell wrote: > On 09/01/2010 01:14, jhell wrote: >> On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote: >>> No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed, >>> unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk. >> >> ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding th

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
On 9/1/10, jhell wrote: > On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote: >> No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed, >> unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk. > > ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding this right... > In this case, yes. Becaus

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 09/01/2010 01:14, jhell wrote: > On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote: >> No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed, >> unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk. > > ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding this right... > No wonder why s

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 09/01/2010 00:58, b. f. wrote: > No, it will still take effect, after the math/blas Makefile is parsed, > unless _WITHOUT_SRCCONF is defined. See bsd.own.mk. ports(7) pulls in src.conf ??? I hope I am not understanding this right... -- jhell,v __

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
On 9/1/10, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. wrote: >> On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: >So according to bsd.own.mk, this is the correct test for the math/blas >port to determine if profiling libraries should be built: > >.if !defined(WITHOUT_PROFILE) >PLIST_FILES+= lib/lib

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 09/01/2010 00:10, Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. wrote: >> On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: >>> Looking closer at the math/blas & math/lapack ports: >>> >>> This statement does not make any sense. The logic is backwards for every >>> instance. And WITH_PROFILE would do. >

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread Scot Hetzel
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:06 PM, b. f. wrote: > On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: >> Looking closer at the math/blas & math/lapack ports: >> >> This statement does not make any sense. The logic is backwards for every >> instance. And WITH_PROFILE would do. >> .if !(defined(NOPROFILE) || defined(NO_PROFIL

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 08/31/2010 20:06, b. f. wrote: > ? gfortran44 builds the object files, and gcc44 performs the linking > for the shared library. Their default search directories normally > allow them to find libgfortran at compile- and link-time. And > afterwards, at run-time, the appropriate rpath is inscribe

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: > Looking closer at the math/blas & math/lapack ports: > > This statement does not make any sense. The logic is backwards for every > instance. And WITH_PROFILE would do. > .if !(defined(NOPROFILE) || defined(NO_PROFILE) || defined(WITHOUT_PROFILE)) > PLIST_FILES+= lib/l

INDEX now builds successfully on 6.x

2010-08-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
On 8/31/10, jhell wrote: > On 08/31/2010 15:06, b. f. wrote: >> Would you elaborate, please? Where is a transcript showing the linking >> failure? >> Would you mail it to me off-list? > > Simply -lgfortran by it self should not work. Since lib directories > gcc44 gcc45 gcc46 and such are not in t

Re: comms/spandsp compile failure on upgrade

2010-08-31 Thread Renato Botelho
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 7:13 PM, David Southwell wrote: > > Hi > > On amd64 freebsd 7.1 Strange, i tested it on 7.2-RELEASE amd64 and it built without any problem. All your other ports are up-to-date? -- Renato Botelho ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org m

comms/spandsp compile failure on upgrade

2010-08-31 Thread David Southwell
Hi On amd64 freebsd 7.1 Compile failure: spandsp/dc_restore.h:151: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built- in function 'rintl' libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include - I/usr/local/include/libxml2 -DNDEBUG -std=gnu99 -ffast-math -Wall -Wunused- v

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
Looking closer at the math/blas & math/lapack ports: This statement does not make any sense. The logic is backwards for every instance. And WITH_PROFILE would do. .if !(defined(NOPROFILE) || defined(NO_PROFILE) || defined(WITHOUT_PROFILE)) PLIST_FILES+= lib/libblas_p.a .endif Which is basicall

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2010-08-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: btpeer-0.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/net/Sockets-devel Committers on the hook: avilla avl bapt brooks cy fjoe garga jacula jadawin lth olgeni pav pgollucci rene sylvio M

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 08/31/2010 15:06, b. f. wrote: > Would you elaborate, please? Where is a transcript showing the linking > failure? > Would you mail it to me off-list? Simply -lgfortran by it self should not work. Since lib directories gcc44 gcc45 gcc46 and such are not in the standard path -L/usr/local/lib/g

Re: current ports Mk make fetch calls wget fails to support schemes

2010-08-31 Thread Julian H. Stacey
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > ... > Hmm... Can't reproduce it here, but this is now the 2nd report of this > problem to hit -ports. > ... Thanks for looking, I'll send you more of my env. by private mail off list Eric Masson wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick writes: > > Hi, > > > Hmm... Can't reproduce it

Re: math/blas linking to gfortran with LDADD?= -lgfortran

2010-08-31 Thread b. f.
>The subject listed port fails to link during an upgrade from the >previous version. Looking into this further libblas.so.2 without being Would you elaborate, please? Where is a transcript showing the linking failure? Would you mail it to me off-list? >linked to gfortran is correct as in the alr

Re: current ports Mk make fetch calls wget fails to support schemes

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Masson
Jeremy Chadwick writes: Hi, > Hmm... Can't reproduce it here, but this is now the 2nd report of this > problem to hit -ports. Removing wget from path solves the issue faced when building mod_celt in net/freeswitch. Thanks for you help diagnosing the problem. Éric Masson -- Il vaut mieux de

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2010-08-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: btpeer-0.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/net/Sockets-devel Committers on the hook: avilla avl bapt garga jadawin lth olgeni rene sylvio Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U

Re: ports/146754: [patch] new port: add devel/atf framework to ports

2010-08-31 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ade Lovett wrote: > > On Aug 29, 2010, at 20:00 , Garrett Cooper wrote: >>    Found the reference. The stuff that gets installed under >> ${PREFIX}/tests (to some degree) are actually executables >> ($(execdir)), and some are data files ($(datarootdir)). > > Woo.

Re: net/freeswitch-core

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Masson
Jeremy Chadwick writes: Hi Jeremy, > Looks like the entire build, and installation, bombs out once it tries > to deal with something called "celt-0.7.1.tar.gz" (mod_celt). Taken > from the build script: Ok, I can reproduce the problem in fs source tree on my box, gmake -d in mod_celt director

Re: current ports Mk make fetch calls wget fails to support schemes

2010-08-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 07:39:32PM +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > >Submitter-Id:current-users > >Originator: Julian H. Stacey > >Organization:http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, > >Munich/Muenchen. > >Confidential:no > >Synopsis:current ports Mk make fetc

Re: RFT: deskutils/sciplore-mindmapping

2010-08-31 Thread jhell
On 08/31/2010 13:01, Matthias Andree wrote: > Am 31.08.2010 17:47, schrieb J. Hellenthal: > >> Runs as expected on FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE. Java runs like shit, menu's for >> me have been wacked for some time with no seen fix in the future. I am >> starting to think its my minimal approach to X using X

current ports Mk make fetch calls wget fails to support schemes

2010-08-31 Thread Julian H. Stacey
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Julian H. Stacey >Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Linux Unix Consultancy, Munich/Muenchen. >Confidential: no >Synopsis: current ports Mk make fetch calls wget fails to support schemes >Severity: serious >Priority: high >Category

Re: RFT: deskutils/sciplore-mindmapping

2010-08-31 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 31.08.2010 17:47, schrieb J. Hellenthal: > Runs as expected on FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE. Java runs like shit, menu's for > me have been wacked for some time with no seen fix in the future. I am > starting to think its my minimal approach to X using Xmonad as a window > manager but the last time I tri

Re: ports/146754: [patch] new port: add devel/atf framework to ports

2010-08-31 Thread Ade Lovett
On Aug 29, 2010, at 20:00 , Garrett Cooper wrote: >Found the reference. The stuff that gets installed under > ${PREFIX}/tests (to some degree) are actually executables > ($(execdir)), and some are data files ($(datarootdir)). Woo. Lots of fun there. :) As much as I hate committing a port th

Re: net/freeswitch-core

2010-08-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 06:15:58PM +0200, Eric Masson wrote: > Hello, > > When building/installing net/freeswitch-core on an amd64 8.1-RELEASE, > only the following modules are installed in > /usr/local/lib/freeswitch/mod : > e...@srvbsdfenssv:~> ll /usr/local/lib/freeswitch/mod/ > total 288 > -rw

net/freeswitch-core

2010-08-31 Thread Eric Masson
Hello, When building/installing net/freeswitch-core on an amd64 8.1-RELEASE, only the following modules are installed in /usr/local/lib/freeswitch/mod : e...@srvbsdfenssv:~> ll /usr/local/lib/freeswitch/mod/ total 288 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel1239 31 aoû 16:24 mod_amr.la -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wh

Re: RFT: deskutils/sciplore-mindmapping

2010-08-31 Thread J. Hellenthal
On 08/31/2010 06:14, Sutra Zhou wrote: > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I have create a new port for SciPlore Mind Mapping, a mind mapper/manager >> with reference and PDF management (to integrate with JabRef, Mendeley, >> BibTeX). The port requires Jav

INDEX build failed for 6.x

2010-08-31 Thread Erwin Lansing
INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-6 - please wait..pkg_info: not found pkg_info: not found Done. make_index: btpeer-0.2.1: no entry for /usr/ports/net/Sockets-devel Committers on the hook: avilla avl garga jadawin lth olgeni sylvio Most recent CVS update was: U MOVED U accessibil

Re: RFT: deskutils/sciplore-mindmapping

2010-08-31 Thread Sutra Zhou
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: > Greetings, > > I have create a new port for SciPlore Mind Mapping, a mind mapper/manager > with reference and PDF management (to integrate with JabRef, Mendeley, > BibTeX). The port requires Java 1.6. > > Since this is my first Java-related

Re: devel/sdl12 and gcc -m32

2010-08-31 Thread Anonymous
René Ladan writes: >> -m32 is not supported yet, especially not by the ports tree. And even if >> you manage to compile sources it wouldn't link against 64bit libs. >> > Hmm ok, I'll add a NOT_FOR_ARCH / ONLY_FOR_ARCH to the port. ONLY_FOR_ARCHS/NOT_FOR_ARCHS set IGNORE, not BROKEN for the port.

Re: devel/sdl12 and gcc -m32

2010-08-31 Thread René Ladan
(cc'ing submitter of the port) 2010/8/31 Anonymous : > René Ladan writes: > >> Hi, >> >> I was trying to build the future port games/avp-demo (ports/138806) on >> my 9.0-amd64 laptop >> with system gcc, but this failed because of SDL errors: >> >> gcc -m32 -g -Wall -pipe -Isrc -Isrc/include -Isrc

Re: devel/sdl12 and gcc -m32

2010-08-31 Thread Anonymous
René Ladan writes: > Hi, > > I was trying to build the future port games/avp-demo (ports/138806) on > my 9.0-amd64 laptop > with system gcc, but this failed because of SDL errors: > > gcc -m32 -g -Wall -pipe -Isrc -Isrc/include -Isrc/win95 -Isrc/avp > -Isrc/avp/win95 -Isrc/avp/support -Isrc/avp/w

devel/sdl12 and gcc -m32

2010-08-31 Thread René Ladan
Hi, I was trying to build the future port games/avp-demo (ports/138806) on my 9.0-amd64 laptop with system gcc, but this failed because of SDL errors: gcc -m32 -g -Wall -pipe -Isrc -Isrc/include -Isrc/win95 -Isrc/avp -Isrc/avp/win95 -Isrc/avp/support -Isrc/avp/win95/frontend -Isrc/avp/win95/gadge

Re: textproc/uni2ascii build failure on FreeBSD 7.3

2010-08-31 Thread Emanuel Haupt
Bill Poser wrote: > > > > Alternatively, one could try and get the author (CC'd) to restore > > getline.c in the official source but only build it/make use of it > > when a specific configure or make flag is specified. > > > > Hi. I think that's the best solution. I'll restore the internal > > cop

Re: textproc/uni2ascii build failure on FreeBSD 7.3

2010-08-31 Thread Bill Poser
> > Alternatively, one could try and get the author (CC'd) to restore > getline.c in the official source but only build it/make use of it when a > specific configure or make flag is specified. > > Hi. I think that's the best solution. I'll restore the internal copy and test for the library version

Re: textproc/uni2ascii build failure on FreeBSD 7.3

2010-08-31 Thread Emanuel Haupt
andrew clarke wrote: > Hi, > > uni2ascii no longer builds on FreeBSD 7.3: > > cc -DNEWSUMMARY -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -o ascii2uni > ascii2uni.o enttbl.o GetWord.o putu8.o SetFormat.o ascii2uni.o(.text > +0xb23): In function main': : undefined reference to getline' > > Quoting the Ch

Re: textproc/uni2ascii build failure on FreeBSD 7.3

2010-08-31 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 04:27:59PM +1000, andrew clarke wrote: > uni2ascii no longer builds on FreeBSD 7.3: > > cc -DNEWSUMMARY -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -o ascii2uni ascii2uni.o > enttbl.o GetWord.o putu8.o SetFormat.o > ascii2uni.o(.text+0xb23): In function main': > : undefined refer

Re: i7z for FreeBSD

2010-08-31 Thread Emanuel Haupt
jhell wrote: > On 08/27/2010 09:30, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > How hard would it be to port i7z to FreeBSD? Seems like a very > > useful tool. > > > > http://code.google.com/p/i7z/ > > > > This seems a little like ports/misc/cpuid, is it ? Not quite. i7z is primarily for dumping i7, i3, i5 CPU f